Bug 441574 – crash in GNOME Commander: I was editing a rule in ...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 441574 - crash in GNOME Commander: I was editing a rule in ...


Summary:	crash in GNOME Commander: I was editing a rule in ...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 375704

Product:	gnome-commander
Classification:	Other
Component:	application
Version:	1.2.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	1.2.4
Assigned To:	epiotr
QA Contact:	epiotr

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-05-27 12:29 UTC by misakmilan
Modified:	2007-07-30 01:07 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description misakmilan 2007-05-27 12:29:20 UTC

Version: 1.2.0

What were you doing when the application crashed?
I was editing a rule in the Batch renaming tool in GnomeCommander


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 65503232 vsize: 0 resident: 65503232 share: 0 rss: 13193216 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1180268278 rtime: 0 utime: 647 stime: 0 cutime:623 cstime: 0 timeout: 24 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-commander'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225206096 (LWP 11323)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 136265

Thread 1 (Thread -1225206096 (LWP 11323))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 g_free
from /usr/lib/gnome-commander/libgcmd.so.0
#5 gnome_cmd_dialog_new
from /usr/lib/gnome-commander/libgcmd.so.0
#6 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#7 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 gtk_button_clicked
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 gtk_button_set_alignment
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 g_value_set_boxed
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 gtk_button_released
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 gtk_button_released
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 g_value_set_boxed
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#24 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#26 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 gtk_widget_get_default_style
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#28 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#29 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 _gdk_events_init
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#31 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#32 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#33 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#34 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#35 ??
#36 ??
#37 ??
#38 _IO_stdin_used
#39 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 André Klapper 2007-07-30 01:07:47 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 375704 ***