After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 440855 - crash in html_object_change_set at htmlobject.c:1424
crash in html_object_change_set at htmlobject.c:1424
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 338921
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.10.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-05-24 01:26 UTC by free.perception
Modified: 2009-01-27 04:24 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description free.perception 2007-05-24 01:26:54 UTC
Version: 2.12.x

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Walk over mail messages with "up" and "down" keys relatively fast (before message changes its state from "unread" to "read").


Distribution: Gentoo Base System release 2.0.0_alpha3
Gnome Release: 2.18.1 2007-04-16 (Gentoo)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.1

System: Linux 2.6.21-gentoo #2 PREEMPT Fri Apr 27 14:21:05 NOVST 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Glossy
Icon Theme: Tango

Memory status: size: 274960384 vsize: 274960384 resident: 66371584 share: 56963072 rss: 66371584 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1179917770 rtime: 767 utime: 671 stime: 96 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.12'

Really redefine built-in command "frame"? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
Really redefine built-in command "thread"? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
Really redefine built-in command "start"? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208923680 (LWP 32534)]
[New Thread -1426809968 (LWP 658)]
[New Thread -1418417264 (LWP 657)]
[New Thread -1417610352 (LWP 650)]
[New Thread -1408881776 (LWP 613)]
[New Thread -1400349808 (LWP 477)]
[New Thread -1382392944 (LWP 424)]
[New Thread -1390785648 (LWP 423)]
[New Thread -1374000240 (LWP 386)]
[New Thread -1365607536 (LWP 385)]
_______________________________________________________________________________
     eax:FFFFFE00 ebx:00000D5D  ecx:BF8A2128  edx:00000000     eflags:00000293
     esi:0000026C edi:08426658  esp:BF8A2044  ebp:BF8A2138     eip:B7F42410
     cs:0073  ds:007B  es:007B  fs:0000  gs:0033  ss:007B    o d I t S z A p C 
[007B:BF8A2044]---------------------------------------------------------[stack]
BF8A2074 : 5A 17 FB 4E  02 00 00 00 - 00 00 00 00  3C 21 8A BF Z..N........<!..
BF8A2064 : 28 21 8A BF  00 00 00 00 - 8A E8 42 47  10 A6 4C 47 (!........BG..LG
BF8A2054 : 60 FE 1C 4F  00 00 00 00 - FD 9B 19 4F  5D 0D 00 00 `..O.......O]...
BF8A2044 : 38 21 8A BF  00 00 00 00 - 28 21 8A BF  6B EC EE 43 8!......(!..k..C
[007B:08426658]---------------------------------------------------------[ data]
08426658 : 10 D5 4A 08  00 00 00 00 - 70 A7 2A 08  88 CC 30 08 ..J.....p.*...0.
08426668 : 00 00 00 00  0D 00 00 00 - E8 3B 13 08  E8 4A 4B 08 .........;...JK.
[0073:B7F42410]---------------------------------------------------------[ code]
0xb7f42410 <__kernel_vsyscall+16>:	pop    %ebp
0xb7f42411 <__kernel_vsyscall+17>:	pop    %edx
0xb7f42412 <__kernel_vsyscall+18>:	pop    %ecx
0xb7f42413 <__kernel_vsyscall+19>:	ret    
0xb7f42414 <_fini+93696>:	nop    
0xb7f42415 <_fini+93697>:	nop    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0xb7f42410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 ??
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    at gnome-ui-init.c line 872
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 html_object_change_set
    at htmlobject.c line 1424
  • #5 update_or_redraw
    at htmlimage.c line 1087
  • #6 IA__g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    at gmarshal.c line 77
  • #7 IA__g_closure_invoke
    at gclosure.c line 490
  • #8 signal_emit_unlocked_R
    at gsignal.c line 2440
  • #9 IA__g_signal_emit_valist
    at gsignal.c line 2199
  • #10 IA__g_signal_emit
    at gsignal.c line 2243
  • #11 gdk_pixbuf_loader_prepare
    at gdk-pixbuf-loader.c line 283
  • #12 gdk_pixbuf__jpeg_image_load_increment
    at io-jpeg.c line 757
  • #13 gdk_pixbuf_loader_load_module
    at gdk-pixbuf-loader.c line 386
  • #14 IA__gdk_pixbuf_loader_write
    at gdk-pixbuf-loader.c line 409
  • #15 html_image_factory_write_pixbuf
    at htmlimage.c line 1147
  • #16 gtk_html_stream_write
    at gtkhtml-stream.c line 79
  • #17 emhs_sync_write
    at em-html-stream.c line 114
  • #18 emcs_gui_received
    at em-sync-stream.c line 142
  • #19 g_io_unix_dispatch
    at giounix.c line 162
  • #20 IA__g_main_context_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 2061
  • #21 g_main_context_iterate
    at gmain.c line 2694
  • #22 IA__g_main_loop_run
    at gmain.c line 2898
  • #23 bonobo_main
    at bonobo-main.c line 311
  • #24 main
    at main.c line 592


----------- .xsession-errors (126 sec old) ---------------------
(epiphany:32524): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_window_group_remove_window: assertion `GTK_IS_WINDOW_GROUP (window_group)' failed
(gnome-terminal:32523): Vte-WARNING **: No handler for control sequence `device-control-string' defined.
get m.mikhulya pop://m.mikhulya@pop.gmail.com/
Find Items 0
get mihasik pop://mihasik@dove2.parasoft.com/
Find Items 0
get mihasik pop://mihasik@dove2.parasoft.com/
Find Items 0
***MEMORY-WARNING***: gconftool-2[2021]: GSlice: g_thread_init() must be called before all other GLib functions; memory corruption due to late invocation of g_thread_init() has been detected; this pro
get m.mikhulya pop://m.mikhulya@pop.gmail.com/
Find Items 0
get mihasik pop://mihasik@dove2.parasoft.com/
Find Items 0
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Tobias Mueller 2007-12-04 15:01:02 UTC
Thanks for the bugreport :)

Might be bug 338921
Comment 2 free.perception 2007-12-06 09:31:13 UTC
can't reproduce in version 2.21.3

probably this issue was fixed with bug#338921, so please close bug.

While verifying this issue I found minor inconsistency in behavior:
<Alt>+<Up> behaves in the same way as simple <Up> (goes one mail up)
<Alt>+<Down> does nothing
Comment 3 free.perception 2007-12-12 02:52:42 UTC
Resolve bug as FIXED since it is not reproducable anymore.
Comment 4 Akhil Laddha 2009-01-27 04:24:15 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 338921 ***