After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 440446 - crash in Tasks: I clicked on Evolution (...
crash in Tasks: I clicked on Evolution (...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 447591
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 487400 514310 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-05-22 13:24 UTC by Nicolas Fairon
Modified: 2008-05-19 15:00 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description Nicolas Fairon 2007-05-22 13:24:10 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
I clicked on Evolution (already started) and saw that a new mail arrived (evolution check for new mails every 5 minutes). I clicked on the mail and Evolution crashed


Distribution: Fedora release 6.93 (Rawhide)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3167.fc7 #1 SMP Thu May 17 23:05:53 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 167006208 vsize: 167006208 resident: 41103360 share: 23011328 rss: 41103360 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1179811215 rtime: 2538 utime: 2117 stime: 421 cutime:65 cstime: 18 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208670496 (LWP 4092)]
[New Thread -1333593200 (LWP 13270)]
[New Thread -1228801136 (LWP 13269)]
[New Thread -1290867824 (LWP 11563)]
[New Thread -1301357680 (LWP 4129)]
[New Thread -1249780848 (LWP 4103)]
0x00c64402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208670496 (LWP 4092))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 segv_redirect
    at main.c line 408
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_slice_free_chain_with_offset
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_slist_free
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 pango_item_free
    from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
  • #11 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #13 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #15 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #16 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #17 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #19 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #20 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #22 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #23 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #24 g_object_unref
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #25 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #26 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #27 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #29 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #31 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #32 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #33 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #34 g_object_run_dispose
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #35 gtk_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #36 gtk_widget_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #37 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #38 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #39 gtk_container_foreach
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #40 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #41 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #42 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #43 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #44 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #45 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #46 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #47 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #48 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #49 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #50 g_object_unref
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #51 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #52 g_value_unset
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #53 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #54 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #55 gtk_container_remove
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #56 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #57 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #58 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #59 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #60 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #61 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #62 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #63 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #64 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #65 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #66 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #67 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #68 html_engine_parse
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #69 gtk_html_begin_full
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #70 emhs_sync_write
    at em-html-stream.c line 112
  • #71 emss_process_message
    at em-sync-stream.c line 64
  • #72 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #73 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #74 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #75 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #76 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #77 main
    at main.c line 586
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (7 sec old) ---------------------
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libgsf-1.so.114" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libcroco-0.6.so.3" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libbz2.so.1" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 palfrey 2007-05-28 13:09:54 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot
to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash.
Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see
http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so.
Thanks in advance!
Comment 2 Karsten Bräckelmann 2007-06-27 02:22:16 UTC
Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information asked for.
Thanks!
Comment 3 Tobias Mueller 2007-08-23 00:32:00 UTC
I'm sorry for the spam. I was about to mark this bug as a dup of 444866 but then I've noticed
  • #10 pango_item_free
    from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0

Comment 4 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-21 18:03:34 UTC
perhaps, same as bug #440422 ?
Comment 5 Akhil Laddha 2007-10-18 04:30:19 UTC
*** Bug 487400 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Akhil Laddha 2008-02-05 08:07:32 UTC
*** Bug 514310 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Akhil Laddha 2008-05-19 15:00:17 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but
we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be
solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software
upgrade.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 447591 ***