After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 43343 - metadata copying code doesn't ensure source metafile is read in
metadata copying code doesn't ensure source metafile is read in
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: Metadata
0.x.x [obsolete]
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: old
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2000-09-28 20:16 UTC by Darin Adler
Modified: 2008-03-23 20:12 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10


Description Darin Adler 2001-09-10 00:40:23 UTC 
This is definitely an architecture problem, but I'm not sure it's a practical
one. It could explain some cases where we've seen metadata not copied. I'm not
sure.



------- Additional Comments From darin@bentspoon.com 2000-09-29 10:01:18 ----

The actual problems caused by this bug could get higher priority, but the "I see
bad things in the code" is just a P3/usable.



------- Additional Comments From don@eazel.com 2000-12-15 09:32:19 ----

Batch move all 254 PR3 P5 bugs to 1.0.1.




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2001-09-09 20:40 -------
Comment 1 John Fleck 2002-01-05 04:05:28 UTC 
Changing to "old" target milestone for all bugs laying around with no milestone set.
Comment 2 Sebastien Bacher 2003-12-03 12:53:02 UTC 
Could somebody look if this bug is still here with nautilus 2.4.1 ?
This bug is pretty old, and  I don't know how to check this ...
Comment 3 Bryan W Clark 2004-01-09 00:24:01 UTC 
Yes this is still around (at least the comment)

clarkbw@bryan nautilus $ grep -rn 43343 *
libnautilus-private/nautilus-metafile.c:1407:   /* FIXME
bugzilla.gnome.org 43343: This does not properly

I'm going to move to REOPEN instead of NEEDINFO since this does still
exist, however I don't know if it's needed.  Dave?
Comment 4 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-03-23 20:12:25 UTC 
The comment isn't there anymore...
As this is almost eight years old, I'm closing it as OBSOLETE.