After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 424704 - crash in CD/DVD Creator: searching on an external...
crash in CD/DVD Creator: searching on an external...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 364159
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-03-31 00:13 UTC by achim.lindenberger
Modified: 2007-04-07 14:11 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description achim.lindenberger 2007-03-31 00:13:38 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
searching on an external usb-disk after oldfield


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 89522176 vsize: 0 resident: 89522176 share: 0 rss: 33804288 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1175296051 rtime: 0 utime: 1006 stime: 0 cutime:454 cstime: 0 timeout: 552 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 156

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226594640 (LWP 4463)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1226594640 (LWP 4463))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 nautilus_file_get_uri
  • #5 nautilus_file_get_parent_uri
  • #6 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
  • #7 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
  • #8 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
  • #9 g_list_foreach
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_list_foreach
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_list_foreach
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_list_foreach
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_list_foreach
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_list_foreach
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_list_foreach
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #16 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
  • #17 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
  • #18 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
  • #19 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #23 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #24 nautilus_directory_async_state_changed
  • #25 nautilus_marshal_BOOLEAN__POINTER
  • #26 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #31 nautilus_marshal_BOOLEAN__POINTER
  • #32 nautilus_marshal_BOOLEAN__POINTER
  • #33 g_source_is_destroyed
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #34 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #35 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #36 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #37 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #38 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
  • #39 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #40 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 palfrey 2007-04-07 14:11:01 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 364159 ***