Bug 418939 – crash in Open Folder: visualizzava la preview ...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 418939 - crash in Open Folder: visualizzava la preview ...


Summary:	crash in Open Folder: visualizzava la preview ...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 357939

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-03-16 12:27 UTC by neroclaudius
Modified:	2007-03-16 12:55 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description neroclaudius 2007-03-16 12:27:32 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
visualizzava la preview di file in SVG di OpenClipArt


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 205344768 vsize: 0 resident: 205344768 share: 0 rss: 54792192 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1174048002 rtime: 0 utime: 1387 stime: 0 cutime:1179 cstime: 0 timeout: 208 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226582352 (LWP 6865)]
[New Thread -1286681696 (LWP 6902)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 119100

Thread 2 (Thread -1286681696 (LWP 6902))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 __kernel_vsyscall
#5 raise
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#6 abort
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#7 __assert_fail
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#8 cairo_ft_scaled_font_unlock_face
from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2
#9 cairo_ft_scaled_font_lock_face
from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2
#10 pango_cairo_fc_font_get_type
from /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
#11 pango_fc_font_lock_face
from /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
#12 script_engine_init
from /usr/lib/pango/1.5.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so
#13 pango_coverage_new
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#14 pango_shape
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#15 pango_layout_set_width
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#16 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#17 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#18 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#19 pango_layout_get_pixel_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#20 pango_layout_get_pixel_size
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#21 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#22 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#23 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#24 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#25 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#26 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#27 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#28 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#29 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#30 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#31 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#32 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#33 rsvg_handle_render_cairo_sub
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#34 rsvg_handle_get_pixbuf_sub
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#35 rsvg_handle_get_pixbuf
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#36 fill_info
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/svg_loader.so
#37 ??
#38 ??

Comment 1 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-16 12:55:36 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 357939 ***