GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 416310
crash in Help: attempted to print the ...
Last modified: 2007-04-30 15:02:07 UTC
Version: 2.16.0 What were you doing when the application crashed? attempted to print the GnuBasics totorial in GnuCash. My printer is an Epson Stylus photo R200. The printer has worked OK with smaller print jobs (one page or less). Distribution: Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0 System: Linux 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6 #1 SMP Mon Oct 16 14:54:20 EDT 2006 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 70101000 Selinux: Enforcing Accessibility: Disabled Memory status: size: 62455808 vsize: 0 resident: 62455808 share: 0 rss: 15134720 rss_rlim: 0 CPU usage: start_time: 1173409175 rtime: 0 utime: 88 stime: 0 cutime:73 cstime: 0 timeout: 15 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/yelp' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208613152 (LWP 2595)] [New Thread -1210713200 (LWP 2599)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00627402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 117080
Thread 1 (Thread -1208613152 (LWP 2595))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- QClipboard::setData: Cannot set X11 selection owner for PRIMARY X Error: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) 8 Major opcode: 155 Minor opcode: 6 Resource id: 0x65 ** (bug-buddy:2622): WARNING **: Couldn't load icon for Open Folder X Error: BadPixmap (invalid Pixmap parameter) 4 Major opcode: 54 Minor opcode: 0 Resource id: 0x1400198 X Error: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) 8 Major opcode: 155 Minor opcode: 6 Resource id: 0x1400198 --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 371007 ***