Bug 415154 – crash in Terminal: I was attempting to down...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 415154 - crash in Terminal: I was attempting to down...


Summary:	crash in Terminal: I was attempting to down...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 353498

Product:	gnome-terminal
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers
QA Contact:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-03-06 02:18 UTC by kracette
Modified:	2007-03-06 18:13 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description kracette 2007-03-06 02:18:29 UTC

Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
I was attempting to download a file.  


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 52916224 vsize: 0 resident: 52916224 share: 0 rss: 16519168 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1173137782 rtime: 0 utime: 199 stime: 0 cutime:175 cstime: 0 timeout: 24 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 1431

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225857360 (LWP 6014)]
[New Thread -1249723488 (LWP 6018)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 116197

Thread 1 (Thread -1225857360 (LWP 6014))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 gtk_widget_style_get_valist
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#5 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#6 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#7 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#8 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#9 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#10 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#11 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 gtk_widget_queue_resize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 gtk_notebook_popup_enable
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 gtk_widget_reset_rc_styles
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#28 gtk_rc_get_theme_dir
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#29 gtk_icon_info_get_type
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 g_source_is_destroyed
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#31 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#32 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#33 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#34 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#35 ??
#36 ??
#37 _IO_stdin_used
#38 ??
#39 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Susana 2007-03-06 18:13:15 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 353498 ***