After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 396267 - crash in Evolution: Clicking between two ema...
crash in Evolution: Clicking between two ema...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 359803
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.8.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-01-13 23:11 UTC by David Sterratt
Modified: 2007-01-16 14:59 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description David Sterratt 2007-01-13 23:11:27 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Clicking between two emails with large photos in them (total size of emails 3.2MB and 1.9MB, first with ~4 photos, the second with 2)


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 275386368 vsize: 0 resident: 275386368 share: 0 rss: 127090688 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1168725214 rtime: 0 utime: 26136 stime: 0 cutime:25384 cstime: 0 timeout: 752 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1232914768 (LWP 16221)]
[New Thread -1336935520 (LWP 17566)]
[New Thread -1345328224 (LWP 17509)]
[New Thread -1362113632 (LWP 16365)]
[New Thread -1353720928 (LWP 16364)]
[New Thread -1312445536 (LWP 16245)]
[New Thread -1304052832 (LWP 16244)]
[New Thread -1295660128 (LWP 16241)]
[New Thread -1266926688 (LWP 16239)]
[New Thread -1275401312 (LWP 16232)]
[New Thread -1258140768 (LWP 16230)]
[New Thread -1249711200 (LWP 16228)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1232914768 (LWP 16221))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 segv_redirect
    at main.c line 426
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 g_str_hash
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 g_hash_table_lookup
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 em_cache_lookup
    from /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #8 em_icon_stream_is_resized
    at em-icon-stream.c line 326
  • #9 efhd_change_cursor
    at em-format-html-display.c line 1643
  • #10 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gtk_widget_get_default_style
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 _gdk_events_init
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #21 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #22 main
    at main.c line 615
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 David Sterratt 2007-01-14 01:15:10 UTC
I should add that both emails took a number of seconds to format, presumuably because of the size of the image. When I triggered the bug, I had clicked on the summary line of one email, then clicked on the summary line of the second email before the images in the first had appeared. I may then have clicked back on the first one, before the second email's images had been formatted, though I'm not sure about that. It was probably about then that the bug was triggered.
Comment 2 Kjartan Maraas 2007-01-16 14:59:23 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 359803 ***