Bug 389824 – crash in GNOME Commander: i was trying to view com...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 389824 - crash in GNOME Commander: i was trying to view com...


Summary:	crash in GNOME Commander: i was trying to view com...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 349631

Product:	gnome-commander
Classification:	Other
Component:	networking
Version:	1.2.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	1.2.4
Assigned To:	epiotr
QA Contact:	epiotr

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-12-26 20:05 UTC by maciej.kobuszewski
Modified:	2006-12-28 22:13 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description maciej.kobuszewski 2006-12-26 20:05:55 UTC

Version: 1.2.0

What were you doing when the application crashed?
i was trying to view computers in a workgroup	


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 47984640 vsize: 0 resident: 47984640 share: 0 rss: 16551936 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1167162112 rtime: 0 utime: 2271 stime: 0 cutime:2211 cstime: 0 timeout: 60 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-commander'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208420688 (LWP 14243)]
[New Thread -1233138784 (LWP 14382)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 97138

Thread 1 (Thread -1208420688 (LWP 14243))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 ??
#5 ??
#6 ??
#7 ??
#8 ??
#9 ??
#10 ??
#11 ??
#12 ??
#13 ??
#14 ??
#15 ??
#16 ??
#17 ??
#18 ??
#19 ??
#20 ??
#21 ??
#22 ??
#23 ??
#24 ??
#25 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 epiotr 2006-12-28 22:13:43 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 349631 ***