After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 389375 - crash in gnome-vfs-daemon-method.c:639 / dbus-pending-call.c:674
crash in gnome-vfs-daemon-method.c:639 / dbus-pending-call.c:674
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: gnome-vfs
Classification: Deprecated
Component: Module: smb
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-vfs maintainers
gnome-vfs maintainers
gnome[unmaintained]
: 371307 387818 390442 390745 391153 391796 394280 400045 403091 403360 404990 405215 407628 408433 408487 409227 409455 411277 411876 411931 411938 412256 412461 414188 414430 414710 414902 415961 416343 417218 418108 418897 419485 419772 420275 420717 420718 420723 421230 422034 422672 424050 424095 424441 424555 424557 424561 425128 427593 428652 429370 438025 438337 439722 440005 441390 441877 442334 442914 443665 445074 445648 452076 453250 454319 455413 456691 457426 457449 459057 459105 461747 462660 463282 468178 469480 469553 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-12-25 06:28 UTC by Hyunsik Choi
Modified: 2018-08-17 13:49 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Attachments
1-plc (5.58 KB, text/html)
2015-06-14 14:13 UTC, Eliot
Details

Description Hyunsik Choi 2006-12-25 06:28:23 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
this bug occurs when I try to connect remote smb filesystem via nautilus. I first saw this bug after my linux box updates dbus from 0.6.2 to 1.0.2. However, this is not shared link problem because I recompile whole packages after update.

My system,Gentoo Linux, is using following packages:
gnome-2.16.1
nautilus-2.16.3
gnome-vfs-2.16.3
gnome-keyring-0.6.0


Distribution: Gentoo Base System version 1.12.8
Gnome Release: 2.16.2 2006-12-07 (Gentoo)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 331063296 vsize: 331063296 resident: 34217984 share: 23961600 rss: 34217984 rss_rlim: -1
CPU usage: start_time: 1167025191 rtime: 172 utime: 152 stime: 20 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 47740643130032 (LWP 6024)]
[New Thread 1115703616 (LWP 26506)]
[New Thread 1090525504 (LWP 26505)]
0x00002b6b7ba8b556 in poll () from /lib/libc.so.6

Thread 2 (Thread 1115703616 (LWP 26506))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 raise
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #4 abort
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 ??
    from /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.3
  • #6 ??
    from /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.3
  • #7 dbus_pending_call_steal_reply
    from /usr/lib/libdbus-1.so.3
  • #8 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #9 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #11 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #15 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #16 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #17 ??

Comment 1 Hyunsik Choi 2006-12-25 06:39:52 UTC
I miss one that a sequence of reproduction.

First, type smb url on nautilus.
Second, type both username and password on 'Authentication Required window'
Third, click connect button, and then crash in nautilus.
Comment 2 Martin Wehner 2006-12-27 05:50:43 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so. Thanks in advance!
Comment 3 Susana 2006-12-29 00:05:24 UTC
*** Bug 390442 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 jrb 2006-12-30 14:33:03 UTC
Ahh sorry didn't know their was a dup - well bugbuddy just submitted
I re-compiled all relevant packages with the nostrip FEATURE (so debug info present) as well as debug USE-flag where relevant

Fluid jrb # FEATURES="nostrip" USE="debug" emerge dbus libc glib dbus-glib nautilus gtk+ gnome-vfs -vp

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild   R   ] sys-apps/dbus-1.0.2  USE="X debug -doc (-selinux)" 0 kB 
[ebuild   R   ] sys-libs/glibc-2.5  USE="nls nptl nptlonly -build -glibc-compat20 -glibc-omitfp -hardened (-multilib) -profile (-selinux)" 0 kB 
[ebuild   R   ] dev-libs/glib-2.12.6  USE="debug -doc -hardened" 0 kB 
[ebuild   R   ] dev-libs/dbus-glib-0.72  USE="debug -doc (-selinux)" 0 kB 
[ebuild   R   ] gnome-base/nautilus-2.16.3  USE="X debug gnome -beagle" 0 kB 
[ebuild   R   ] x11-libs/gtk+-2.10.6  USE="X debug jpeg -doc -tiff -xinerama" 0 kB 
[ebuild   R   ] gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.16.3  USE="avahi debug hal ipv6 samba ssl -doc -gnutls" 0 kB 

X re-started. Decided to go for the gdb method (ie get the PID of nautilus) over the bugbuddy method

Once I tried accessing a SMB-share (ie at the point I entered the relevant passwd) this got spat out in the gdb window


Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
[Switching to Thread 1090525504 (LWP 32459)]
0x00002b88f78b3626 in *__GI_raise (sig=<value optimized out>)



at the gdb prompt typed: thread apply all bt
as directed and this is what resulted:



(gdb) thread apply all bt

Thread 29 (Thread 1090525504 (LWP 32459))

  • #0 *__GI_raise
    at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c line 64
  • #1 *__GI_abort
    at abort.c line 88
  • #2 _dbus_abort
    at dbus-sysdeps.c line 84
  • #3 _dbus_warn_check_failed
  • #4 dbus_pending_call_steal_reply
    at dbus-pending-call.c line 674
  • #5 execute_operation
    at gnome-vfs-daemon-method.c line 639
  • #6 do_open_directory
    at gnome-vfs-daemon-method.c line 1142
  • #7 open_from_uri
    at gnome-vfs-directory.c line 95
  • #8 _gnome_vfs_job_execute
  • #9 thread_entry_point
    at gnome-vfs-job-queue.c line 65
  • #10 g_thread_pool_thread_proxy
    at gthreadpool.c line 265
  • #11 g_thread_create_proxy
    at gthread.c line 553
  • #12 start_thread
    at pthread_create.c line 296
  • #13 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #14 ??
    argv=0x7fffb4aa5fc8) at nautilus-main.c:389
0x00002b88f78b3626      64      in ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c
(gdb) 



hope this is of use




Comment 5 Susana 2006-12-31 03:55:56 UTC
*** Bug 391153 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Matthew 2006-12-31 04:03:34 UTC
I wish I could help, but I can't as the system that I was doing this on, has a hard drive failure.
Comment 7 Susana 2007-01-02 18:30:37 UTC
*** Bug 391796 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 André Klapper 2007-01-10 15:52:43 UTC
*** Bug 394280 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 palfrey 2007-01-26 10:46:54 UTC
*** Bug 400045 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Bruno Boaventura 2007-02-01 20:50:59 UTC
*** Bug 403091 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 jwbiagio 2007-02-01 21:58:41 UTC
*** Bug 403360 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Susana 2007-02-06 21:45:13 UTC
*** Bug 404990 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 André Klapper 2007-02-07 21:44:38 UTC
*** Bug 405215 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Christian Kirbach 2007-02-10 00:53:19 UTC
the initial trace looks lika a dup of bug 377826 to me . any thoughts?
Comment 15 Christian Kirbach 2007-02-16 22:09:32 UTC
*** Bug 408433 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 André Klapper 2007-02-18 14:06:11 UTC
*** Bug 409227 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 André Klapper 2007-02-18 14:06:19 UTC
*** Bug 408487 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 André Klapper 2007-02-18 14:06:29 UTC
*** Bug 407628 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19 Susana 2007-02-19 15:26:50 UTC
*** Bug 409455 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-02-23 17:25:29 UTC
*** Bug 411277 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 21 Favio 2007-02-23 19:21:05 UTC
(In reply to comment #14)
> the initial trace looks lika a dup of bug 377826 to me . any thoughts?

Yes, it does and "conectando con servidor samba" means "connecting to a samba server"
It's the same that happens to me.
favio livra com
Comment 22 Susana 2007-02-26 18:00:52 UTC
*** Bug 412256 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23 Christian Kirbach 2007-02-27 22:34:05 UTC
*** Bug 412461 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24 André Klapper 2007-02-28 15:50:56 UTC
*** Bug 411876 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 25 André Klapper 2007-02-28 15:51:03 UTC
*** Bug 411938 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26 André Klapper 2007-02-28 15:51:16 UTC
*** Bug 411931 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27 Susana 2007-03-03 16:18:09 UTC
*** Bug 414188 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 28 Susana 2007-03-03 16:22:27 UTC
There's another stacktrace with debugging symbols and line numbers in bug 414188.
Comment 29 Susana 2007-03-04 12:52:28 UTC
*** Bug 414430 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30 Christian Kirbach 2007-03-04 18:47:03 UTC
thanks for spotting this Susana


What were you doing when the application crashed?
Ctrl+L, smb://user@some.ip/user, [Enter], password dialog, password, [Enter],
crash.


copying important parts of the trace here

  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 raise
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #4 abort
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 _dbus_abort
    at dbus-sysdeps.c line 84
  • #6 _dbus_warn_check_failed
  • #7 dbus_pending_call_steal_reply
    at dbus-pending-call.c line 674
  • #8 execute_operation
    at gnome-vfs-daemon-method.c line 639
  • #9 do_open_directory
    at gnome-vfs-daemon-method.c line 1142
  • #10 open_from_uri
    at gnome-vfs-directory.c line 95
  • #11 _gnome_vfs_job_execute
    at gnome-vfs-job.c line 1443

Comment 31 André Klapper 2007-03-04 22:05:23 UTC
*** Bug 414710 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 32 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-05 14:35:27 UTC
*** Bug 414902 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 33 Daniel Gryniewicz 2007-03-08 16:25:58 UTC
Just a note here:  This does *not* happen with gnome 2.17.92 (so nautilus 2.17.92 and gnome-vfs-2.17.91).  I did a bit of backporting of changes, and only managed to get dbus to core elsewhere.
Comment 34 Susana 2007-03-09 09:19:42 UTC
*** Bug 415961 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 35 Susana 2007-03-09 09:20:45 UTC
*** Bug 416343 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 36 André Klapper 2007-03-13 02:13:38 UTC
*** Bug 417218 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 37 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-16 13:46:11 UTC
*** Bug 418897 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 38 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-20 20:39:05 UTC
*** Bug 420275 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 39 Susana 2007-03-22 23:54:20 UTC
*** Bug 420717 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 40 Susana 2007-03-22 23:54:41 UTC
*** Bug 420723 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 41 Susana 2007-03-22 23:54:41 UTC
*** Bug 420718 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 42 André Klapper 2007-03-29 02:01:36 UTC
*** Bug 421230 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 43 André Klapper 2007-03-29 02:02:13 UTC
*** Bug 418108 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 44 André Klapper 2007-03-29 02:02:20 UTC
*** Bug 419485 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 45 André Klapper 2007-03-29 02:02:27 UTC
*** Bug 419772 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 46 André Klapper 2007-03-29 02:02:34 UTC
*** Bug 422034 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 47 André Klapper 2007-03-29 02:02:39 UTC
*** Bug 422672 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 48 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-29 13:15:49 UTC
*** Bug 424050 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 49 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-29 13:15:54 UTC
*** Bug 424095 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 50 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-31 02:33:53 UTC
*** Bug 424555 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 51 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-31 02:34:25 UTC
*** Bug 424441 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 52 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-31 02:36:19 UTC
*** Bug 424561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 53 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-31 02:36:27 UTC
*** Bug 424557 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 54 palfrey 2007-04-07 14:12:00 UTC
*** Bug 425128 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 55 Pascal Terjan 2007-04-08 14:52:11 UTC
*** Bug 427593 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 56 André Klapper 2007-04-11 16:19:18 UTC
*** Bug 428652 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 57 palfrey 2007-04-16 15:52:18 UTC
*** Bug 429370 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 58 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-05-13 02:05:25 UTC
*** Bug 438025 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 59 palfrey 2007-05-18 12:45:37 UTC
*** Bug 438337 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 60 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-05-19 17:27:54 UTC
*** Bug 439722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 61 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-05-20 19:26:05 UTC
*** Bug 440005 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 62 Susana 2007-05-26 12:47:47 UTC
*** Bug 441390 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 63 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-05-29 01:43:21 UTC
*** Bug 441877 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 64 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-06-04 00:17:41 UTC
*** Bug 443665 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 65 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-06-05 00:35:24 UTC
*** Bug 442334 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 66 palfrey 2007-06-11 09:10:25 UTC
*** Bug 390745 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 67 palfrey 2007-06-11 09:10:32 UTC
*** Bug 445648 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 68 palfrey 2007-06-11 09:10:40 UTC
*** Bug 371307 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 69 palfrey 2007-06-11 09:10:50 UTC
*** Bug 445074 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 70 palfrey 2007-06-11 09:11:04 UTC
*** Bug 442914 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 71 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-06-29 01:01:35 UTC
*** Bug 452076 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 72 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-07-02 23:37:53 UTC
*** Bug 453250 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 73 André Klapper 2007-07-25 09:47:46 UTC
*** Bug 459105 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 74 André Klapper 2007-07-25 09:47:49 UTC
*** Bug 459057 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 75 André Klapper 2007-07-25 09:47:54 UTC
*** Bug 457449 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 76 André Klapper 2007-07-25 09:48:01 UTC
*** Bug 457426 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 77 André Klapper 2007-07-25 09:48:19 UTC
*** Bug 455413 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 78 André Klapper 2007-07-25 09:48:26 UTC
*** Bug 456691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 79 Iestyn Pryce 2007-08-02 17:07:56 UTC
*** Bug 462660 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 80 Susana 2007-08-06 14:16:51 UTC
*** Bug 461747 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 81 Susana 2007-08-06 16:45:33 UTC
*** Bug 463282 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 82 André Klapper 2007-09-05 03:26:18 UTC
*** Bug 387818 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 83 André Klapper 2007-09-05 03:27:31 UTC
*** Bug 454319 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 84 André Klapper 2007-09-05 03:27:33 UTC
*** Bug 468178 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 85 André Klapper 2007-09-05 03:27:37 UTC
*** Bug 469480 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 86 André Klapper 2007-09-05 03:27:39 UTC
*** Bug 469553 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 87 Eliot 2015-06-14 14:13:11 UTC
Created attachment 305231 [details]
1-plc
Comment 88 André Klapper 2018-08-17 13:49:33 UTC
gnome-vfs got deprecated in 2008.

gnome-vfs is not under active development anymore and had its last code changes
in 2011. Its codebase has been archived:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Archive/gnome-vfs/commits/master

gio (in glib) and gvfs are its successors. See https://developer.gnome.org/gio/stable/ch33.html and https://people.gnome.org/~gicmo/gio-migration-guide/ for porting info.

Closing this report as WONTFIX as part of Bugzilla Housekeeping to reflect
reality. Feel free to open a task in GNOME Gitlab if the issue described in this task still applies to a recent + supported version of glib/gio/gvfs. Thanks!