After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 389086 - crash in Theme: I was adding new icons t...
crash in Theme: I was adding new icons t...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 349471
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] theme-manager
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Thomas Wood
Control-Center Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-12-24 01:54 UTC by ozzie_poland
Modified: 2006-12-24 04:04 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description ozzie_poland 2006-12-24 01:54:02 UTC 
Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
I was adding new icons that I had from gnome web site


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 81846272 vsize: 0 resident: 81846272 share: 0 rss: 21725184 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1166924726 rtime: 0 utime: 4488 stime: 0 cutime:3833 cstime: 0 timeout: 655 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 1829

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-theme-manager'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225161040 (LWP 12102)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 96595

Thread 1 (Thread -1225161040 (LWP 12102))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 strrchr
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #5 g_path_get_dirname
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 gnome_theme_details_reread_themes_from_disk
  • #7 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 






Comment 1


Bruno Boaventura





          2006-12-24 04:04:26 UTC
        



Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 349471 ***