After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 385011 - Gnome file chooser/selector is way to small
Gnome file chooser/selector is way to small
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 325477
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: Widget: GtkFileChooser
2.10.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gtk-bugs
Federico Mena Quintero
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-12-12 10:29 UTC by Sebastien Bacher
Modified: 2006-12-12 13:22 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description Sebastien Bacher 2006-12-12 10:29:35 UTC
That bug has been opened on https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/gtk+2.0/+bug/75324

"Today, many people use resolution like 1280*1024 and even 1600*1200.

Todays file selector dialog is WAY to small. It should use a (configurable) percent of the screen height/width.

I KNOW that this is one of the reasons people think Linux is bad. Maybe it sounds strange, but if the first thing you see is a tiny tiny file selector and you have to scroll forever you get get pretty dissapointed if you are used to the windows file selector. It is better then gnomes. Time to change that ...
...
> Thank you for your bug. Could you attach a screenshot illustrating your problem? Is your problem the ~5 folder lines displayed by default?
...
Yes.

It should be more like 75% of screen height and not a fixed number of lines.

I se nog god reason why not fill more of the screen as the user has made the choice to select a file. When you have 100+ files and dirs in a directory (home dir for example) and you only see ~5 lines at the time it takes to much time scrolling."
Comment 1 Carlos Garnacho 2006-12-12 13:22:09 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 325477 ***