After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 381846 - crash in Time and Date: instalando soporte para ...
crash in Time and Date: instalando soporte para ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 358747
Product: gnome-system-tools
Classification: Deprecated
Component: time-admin
2.15.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Carlos Garnacho
Carlos Garnacho
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-12-03 10:54 UTC by jumaca
Modified: 2006-12-03 11:44 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description jumaca 2006-12-03 10:54:47 UTC 
Version: 2.15.5

What were you doing when the application crashed?
instalando soporte para ntp. Ningun otro programa corriendo


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 38547456 vsize: 0 resident: 38547456 share: 0 rss: 15769600 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1165141310 rtime: 0 utime: 393 stime: 0 cutime:376 cstime: 0 timeout: 17 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/time-admin'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225909872 (LWP 14738)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 91244

Thread 1 (Thread -1225909872 (LWP 14738))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 g_type_check_instance
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #5 g_signal_handlers_block_matched
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 






Comment 1


Damien Durand





          2006-12-03 11:44:13 UTC
        




*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 358747 ***