After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 375092 - crash in Terminal: Opening terminal applica...
crash in Terminal: Opening terminal applica...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 353498
Product: gnome-terminal
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Terminal Maintainers
GNOME Terminal Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-11-14 13:34 UTC by Riccardo
Modified: 2006-11-15 01:43 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description Riccardo 2006-11-14 13:34:56 UTC
Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Opening terminal application


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 77266944 vsize: 0 resident: 77266944 share: 0 rss: 29892608 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1163496989 rtime: 0 utime: 3773 stime: 0 cutime:3585 cstime: 0 timeout: 188 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 4999

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226729808 (LWP 5423)]
[New Thread -1253336160 (LWP 5429)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1226729808 (LWP 5423))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 gtk_widget_style_get_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #5 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #6 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #7 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #8 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #9 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #10 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 gtk_widget_queue_resize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gtk_notebook_popup_enable
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #20 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 gtk_widget_reset_rc_styles
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 gtk_rc_get_theme_dir
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 gtk_icon_info_get_type
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_source_is_destroyed
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #31 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #32 ??
  • #33 ??
  • #34 _IO_stdin_used
  • #35 ??
  • #36 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 André Klapper 2006-11-15 01:43:24 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 353498 ***