Bug 366162 – crash in Terminal: remote cat on a file and...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 366162 - crash in Terminal: remote cat on a file and...


Summary:	crash in Terminal: remote cat on a file and...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 348979

Product:	gnome-terminal
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers
QA Contact:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-28 08:43 UTC by Adrian Mazarache
Modified:	2006-11-01 23:33 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description Adrian Mazarache 2006-10-28 08:43:33 UTC

Version: 2.16.0

What were you doing when the application crashed?
remote cat on a file and then right click


Distribution: Fedora Core release 6 (Zod)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 62353408 vsize: 0 resident: 62353408 share: 0 rss: 17981440 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1161969854 rtime: 0 utime: 1604 stime: 0 cutime:1420 cstime: 0 timeout: 184 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 3761

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208883504 (LWP 3247)]
[New Thread -1214551152 (LWP 3251)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x002dc402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 79168

Thread 1 (Thread -1208883504 (LWP 3247))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 g_type_check_is_value_type
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#5 g_value_type_compatible
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#6 g_object_class_override_property
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#7 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#10 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#11 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_notebook_popup_enable
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 gtk_widget_reset_rc_styles
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 gtk_rc_get_module_dir
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#28 gtk_icon_info_get_type
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#29 g_source_is_destroyed
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#30 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#31 g_main_context_check
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#32 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#33 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#34 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
#35 __libc_start_main
from /lib/libc.so.6
#36 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-28 18:31:12 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 348814 ***

Comment 2 Behdad Esfahbod 2006-11-01 23:33:50 UTC

Duping to correct bug.  Seems like 348979 was not a dupe of 348814 afterall.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 348979 ***