After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 365747 - PolicyKit and HAL have moved to git
PolicyKit and HAL have moved to git
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 419879
Product: jhbuild
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: module sets
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Jhbuild maintainers
Jhbuild QA
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-10-27 13:44 UTC by William Jon McCann
Modified: 2007-03-19 03:18 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
freedesktop.modules (1.48 KB, patch)
2007-03-03 22:54 UTC, Marc-Andre Lureau 		committed Details | Review

Description William Jon McCann 2006-10-27 13:44:58 UTC 
For the freedesktop.modules we should update PolicyKit and HAL to pull from git.
Comment 1 Marc-Andre Lureau 2007-03-03 22:54:56 UTC 
Created attachment 83852 [details] [review]
freedesktop.modules
Comment 2 Marc-Andre Lureau 2007-03-03 22:57:13 UTC 
the latest patch also removes hal 0.4.

I wonder if it's necessary to also give the fd-2.18.modules patch, because it uses a tarball release. I'll change the status to NEW.
Comment 3 Wouter Bolsterlee (uws) 2007-03-18 22:44:46 UTC 
I think Gnome uses tarball releases, not GIT/SVN/whatever builds...
Comment 4 Marc-Andre Lureau 2007-03-18 23:22:48 UTC 
Please feel free to close this one, and comment on #419879.
Comment 5 Elijah Newren 2007-03-18 23:47:32 UTC 
Yeah, it's just a subset of bug 419879.  (Note, though, that this was against freedesktop.modules rather than freedesktop-2.18.modules, so I would say that the patch makes sense and should be applied, but given that it's just a subset of the other bug we'll track it there).

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 419879 ***
Comment 6 William Jon McCann 2007-03-19 02:03:37 UTC 
Ok, committed then.
Comment 7 Elijah Newren 2007-03-19 03:18:23 UTC 
Ok, marking it as such then.  :)