Bug 360505 – crash in Networking: paramétrage du réseau

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 360505 - crash in Networking: paramétrage du réseau


Summary:	crash in Networking: paramétrage du réseau


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 360435

Product:	gnome-system-tools
Classification:	Deprecated
Component:	network-admin
Version:	2.15.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Carlos Garnacho
QA Contact:	Carlos Garnacho

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-07 21:36 UTC by jolly-t
Modified:	2006-10-07 21:47 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description jolly-t 2006-10-07 21:36:20 UTC

Version: 2.15.5

What were you doing when the application crashed?
paramétrage du réseau


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 29523968 vsize: 0 resident: 29523968 share: 0 rss: 8704000 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1160256945 rtime: 0 utime: 12 stime: 0 cutime:11 cstime: 0 timeout: 1 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/network-admin'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225517392 (LWP 6179)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 75138

Thread 1 (Thread -1225517392 (LWP 6179))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 ??
from /usr/lib/liboobs-1.so.2
#5 ??
#6 ??
#7 ??
#8 ??
#9 ??
#10 ??
#11 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2006-10-07 21:47:13 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 360435 ***