Bug 358799 – crash in XChat-GNOME IRC Chat: About to change the pref...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 358799 - crash in XChat-GNOME IRC Chat: About to change the pref...


Summary:	crash in XChat-GNOME IRC Chat: About to change the pref...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 358405

Product:	xchat-gnome
Classification:	Other
Component:	general
Version:	0.13
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	xchat-gnome maintainers
QA Contact:	xchat-gnome maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-01 15:31 UTC by mahuni
Modified:	2006-10-01 15:32 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description mahuni 2006-10-01 15:31:14 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
About to change the preferences... Weird!


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 75579392 vsize: 0 resident: 75579392 share: 0 rss: 21045248 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1159705133 rtime: 0 utime: 605 stime: 0 cutime:555 cstime: 0 timeout: 50 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/xchat-gnome'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226828112 (LWP 5849)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 73926

Thread 1 (Thread -1226828112 (LWP 5849))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 strcmp
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#5 gtk_file_chooser_button_new
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#6 gtk_file_chooser_button_new
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#7 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 g_signal_emit_by_name
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 _gtk_file_chooser_set_delegate
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_signal_emit_by_name
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 _gtk_file_chooser_set_delegate
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 g_signal_emit_by_name
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#24 _gtk_file_chooser_default_new
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 fs_module_create
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/filesystems/libgnome-vfs.so
#26 gnome_vfs_job_get_count
from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
#27 ??
#28 ??
#29 ??
#30 ??
from /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0
#31 ??
#32 ??
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#33 ??
#34 g_slice_alloc
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#35 g_source_is_destroyed
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#36 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#37 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#38 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#39 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#40 fe_main
#41 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-01 15:32:44 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 358405 ***