GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 358412
crash in Archive Manager: Opening a mail attachmen...
Last modified: 2006-09-30 08:42:27 UTC
Version: 2.16.0 What were you doing when the application crashed? Opening a mail attachment in a gmail account. Distribution: Fedora Core release 5.92 (FC6 Test3) Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0 Memory status: size: 179838976 vsize: 0 resident: 179838976 share: 0 rss: 14483456 rss_rlim: 0 CPU usage: start_time: 1159582093 rtime: 0 utime: 33 stime: 0 cutime:26 cstime: 0 timeout: 7 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/file-roller' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208924464 (LWP 19296)] (no debugging symbols found) 0xb7f3f402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 73639
Thread 1 (Thread -1208924464 (LWP 19296))
Thanks for the bug report. Unfortunately, that stack trace is not very useful in determining the cause of the crash. Can you get us one with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so.
Here is a more complete stack trace. If you need more I can install more debuginfo, the error is quite repeatable. It happens when I hit the extract button in file-roller and has persisted for quite a while. Makes me wonder about the gtk_file_chooser_button_new () entry below...Chuck Distribution: Fedora Core release 5.92 (FC6 Test3) Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0 Memory status: size: 179826688 vsize: 0 resident: 179826688 share: 0 rss: 15548416 rss_rlim: 0 CPU usage: start_time: 1159591748 rtime: 0 utime: 39 stime: 0 cutime:30 cstime: 0 timeout: 9 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/file-roller' Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208310064 (LWP 21202)] 0xb7fd5402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 73653
Thread 1 (Thread -1208310064 (LWP 21202))
charles, thanks a lot for the new stacktrace. this looks like a duplicate of bug 358405. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 358405 ***