After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 355028 - crash in Evolution: double clicking on an at...
crash in Evolution: double clicking on an at...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 340165
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.8.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Harish Krishnaswamy
Evolution QA team
: 355029 355399 355492 355517 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-09-08 23:09 UTC by bob
Modified: 2006-11-10 19:28 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description bob 2006-09-08 23:09:48 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
double clicking on an attached jpg image attachment in an email


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 114720768 vsize: 0 resident: 114720768 share: 0 rss: 27709440 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1157754535 rtime: 0 utime: 913 stime: 0 cutime:866 cstime: 0 timeout: 47 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1232488784 (LWP 6533)]
[New Thread -1312298080 (LWP 6559)]
[New Thread -1303495776 (LWP 6555)]
[New Thread -1295103072 (LWP 6554)]
[New Thread -1286710368 (LWP 6551)]
[New Thread -1266644064 (LWP 6550)]
[New Thread -1257858144 (LWP 6541)]
[New Thread -1249424480 (LWP 6539)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Comment 1 Poornima 2006-09-11 05:55:44 UTC
*** Bug 355029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Poornima 2006-09-11 11:30:34 UTC
*** Bug 355399 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 André Klapper 2006-09-11 21:52:28 UTC
*** Bug 355492 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 André Klapper 2006-09-11 21:53:33 UTC
/me thinks that bug 316516, bug 349236, bug 347285, bug 355028 are duplicates. please check when fixing one of them.
Comment 5 Poornima 2006-09-13 04:38:05 UTC
*** Bug 355517 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2006-11-10 19:28:41 UTC
Marking as duplicate of #340165. This trace isn't very dup-finder friendly.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 340165 ***