Bug 353992 – crash in Rhythmbox Music Player: Importing music collecti...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 353992 - crash in Rhythmbox Music Player: Importing music collecti...


Summary:	crash in Rhythmbox Music Player: Importing music collecti...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 343443

Product:	rhythmbox
Classification:	Other
Component:	general
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	RhythmBox Maintainers
QA Contact:	RhythmBox Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-09-02 16:59 UTC by pycube
Modified:	2006-09-02 22:19 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description pycube 2006-09-02 16:59:54 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Importing music collection.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.15.92 2006-08-22 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.15.92

Memory status: size: 84975616 vsize: 0 resident: 84975616 share: 0 rss: 21745664 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1157216027 rtime: 0 utime: 656 stime: 0 cutime:584 cstime: 0 timeout: 72 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 4

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/rhythmbox'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1227712848 (LWP 18923)]
[New Thread -1240507488 (LWP 18934)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 71426

Thread 1 (Thread -1227712848 (LWP 18923))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 g_type_instance_get_private
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#5 _gdk_gc_init
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#6 g_type_create_instance
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#7 g_object_set
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 g_object_newv
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_object_new_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_object_new
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 _gdk_x11_gc_new
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 gdk_gc_new_with_values
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 gdk_window_clear
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 gdk_gc_new_with_values
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 gdk_gc_new
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_style_attach
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_style_attach
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 ubuntulooks_style_register_type
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libubuntulooks.so
#19 gtk_paint_flat_box
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 _gtk_tree_view_column_autosize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 g_value_set_boxed
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#24 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#26 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 gtk_widget_get_default_style
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#28 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#29 gdk_window_is_viewable
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 gdk_window_process_all_updates
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_container_check_resize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 g_source_is_destroyed
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#33 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#34 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#35 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#36 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#37 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Jonathan Matthew 2006-09-02 22:19:36 UTC

Stack trace matches bug 343443, which still has me totally mystified.

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 343443 ***