After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 350301 - The 'quality' parameter should be confgurable
The 'quality' parameter should be confgurable
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 318376
Product: f-spot
Classification: Other
Component: General
CVS
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: F-spot maintainers
F-spot maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-08-07 15:52 UTC by Gonzalo Paniagua Javier
Modified: 2006-08-08 11:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Gonzalo Paniagua Javier 2006-08-07 15:52:51 UTC
When uploading an album to picasaweb and making it scale the pictures down to 1600x1200, the uploaded album is *much* bigger than the one uploaded by the picasa windows client for the same size.

As an example, a picture whose original size is 2048x1536, file size 921544 bytes is uploaded to a 1600x1200 of about 450kB. The same image is just 130304 bytes when uploaded with the picasa client. When checking the files uploaded, the difference is that the f-spot one has 300dpi while the picasa one has 72dpi.

Shrinking the image with 'mogrify --resize' yields almost the same results as f-spot, while scaling it down with the Gimp generates almost the same thing as the picasa client.
Comment 1 Gonzalo Paniagua Javier 2006-08-07 20:54:29 UTC
I've been playing with this and turns out that the quality parameter, set to 90 in f-spot, is the main reason.

Would it be possible to make that parameter configurable when exporting?
Comment 2 Stephane Delcroix 2006-08-08 09:45:05 UTC
related to bug #318376, can I mark it as dup ?

and btw, export to picasa is not yet in CVS :):) but you know that. I just mention it to avoid confusion to weak minds...
Comment 3 Gonzalo Paniagua Javier 2006-08-08 11:20:17 UTC
Yeah, closing it as dup.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 318376 ***