After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 347430 - Due Date not immediately displayed when using "Click here to add task"
Due Date not immediately displayed when using "Click here to add task"
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
2.8.x
Other Linux
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: Johnny Jacob
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-07-13 17:09 UTC by John Lee
Modified: 2013-09-13 00:54 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.13/2.14



Description John Lee 2006-07-13 17:09:24 UTC
When entering more than one task with a due date in the "Click here to add a task" row, the due date selected is not displayed or correct.

Steps to reproduce behavior:
1. Add due date column to task list
2. Click "Click here to add a task"
3. Enter the summary
4. Click on the due date drop-down and select a date
5. Repeat 

The due date is blank or incorrect on the second entry, but is correct when the task entry is completed.
Comment 1 André Klapper 2006-07-14 12:47:37 UTC
one has to tab out of that widget to be able to read it, yes - confirming.
"incorrect"? haven't seen that, what does it mean? was blank for me all of the time.
Comment 2 John Lee 2006-07-14 21:19:27 UTC
The date is incorrect in the case that you don't remember to tab in and out of the widget during a single entry. It is more confusing in this case, because a date is displayed in the widget and you want to change it: select a new date from the dropdown, press OK, and the widget stil has the old date.
Comment 3 André Klapper 2006-08-12 12:01:01 UTC
makes evo rather hard to use, it's very confusing to the user - it looks like it just would not work at all.
Comment 4 André Klapper 2006-08-20 12:29:52 UTC
reassigning as per bug 330955
Comment 5 Srinivasa Ragavan 2006-08-20 19:41:57 UTC
Fixed to HEAD.