GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 345064
White balance not really good (Raw photos)
Last modified: 2018-07-01 08:59:30 UTC
For some pictures the white balance of the photos is not really good. If I compare the display of a raw photo (Canon 300D) displayed with f-spot and displayed with ufraw (0.8.1) the display in ufraw is much closer to reality. It is not that bad that you can't view the pictures, but since ufraw is open source as well may be it is "fairly easy" to find out what they make different. A sample picture is too large to attach, I don't have a web server where I can upload it. Please let me know how I can provide a picture. [please ignore: (Internal note: for example 1863.crw 05/06)] Other information:
for these photos f-spot is displaying what the camera has chosen for whitebalance, no other correction is currently done.
I believe the DevelopInUfraw extension could be seen as a solution to that problem.
This will probably be fixed by bug 590150
f-spot is not under active development anymore, has not seen code changes for five years, and saw its last tarball release in the year 2010. Its codebase has been archived: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Archive/f-spot/commits/master Closing this report as WONTFIX as part of Bugzilla Housekeeping to reflect reality. Please feel free to reopen this ticket (or rather transfer the project to GNOME Gitlab, as GNOME Bugzilla is deprecated) if anyone takes the responsibility for active development again.