After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 339682 - Proper search facility for filters
Proper search facility for filters
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 303257
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.6.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
evolution[filters]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-04-25 10:23 UTC by Calum Benson
Modified: 2006-05-03 14:18 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.13/2.14



Description Calum Benson 2006-04-25 10:23:40 UTC
I have 50+ mail filters set up, and it's always a pain trying to modify an existing one, as it takes ages to find it-- the ability to search on the filter name isn't usually sufficient.

Two possible UIs spring to mind (which could co-exist):

- Modify the "Create Rule" section of the Message menu/context menu to include "Show Rules for this Message", which would show you a list of all filters that would apply to that message (whether or not, in practice, things like 
"Stop Processing" directives would cause them to be /actually/ applied, although you might consider flagging those somehow.)  If there is only one such filter, just open it for editing.

- Add a proper search box to the existing Message Filters dialog, that filtered the list of filters(!) as you typed into it.  So if I typed "jds", I'd see a list of all filters that matched mails from "jds@sun.com", or filed messages into folders called "jds-ui" or "jds-dev".

All the mail clients I use (Evolution, Thunderbird, Mail.app on OSX) lack this feature, and I curse them all for it regularly!!
Comment 1 André Klapper 2006-04-25 11:19:58 UTC
calum, do you think this is a dup of bug 303257?
Comment 2 Calum Benson 2006-05-03 14:18:49 UTC
Ah yes, looks like it, closing as a dup.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 303257 ***