After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 336740 - contacts are not found with "search by name" if adding them from the mail view
contacts are not found with "search by name" if adding them from the mail view
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 337087
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.6.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-03-31 14:54 UTC by Patrick Ohly
Modified: 2006-04-03 22:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.13/2.14



Description Patrick Ohly 2006-03-31 14:54:15 UTC
Please describe the problem:
After adding a new contact from the mail view (via context menu
"Add to addressbook") this contact does not appear when I go
to my address book and list all contacts with "Name begins with".
Neither is it found by the address completion feature in the mail
composer nor in the address selector of the mail composer.

It is found by "Any field contains" and also correctly appears in
the full list.


Steps to reproduce:
1. look at an email with a new email address
2. use context menu "Add to Address Book", insert into local address book with
full name
3. go to that address book
4. select "Name begins with" as filter, type name



Actual results:
The contact is not listed.


Expected results:
It should be listed because it exists and starts with
the entered name.

Does this happen every time?
Yes.

Other information:
5. "Any field contains" finds the contact when entering the name.
6. Cut and immediately paste the contact -> now it is found by
   "Name starts with" as it should
Comment 1 Patrick Ohly 2006-03-31 15:03:52 UTC
I have compiled Evolution with Garnome 2.14.0.
Comment 2 André Klapper 2006-04-03 22:20:08 UTC
patrick, thanks for reporting.

i'm marking this as a duplicate of bug 337087 because bug 337087 is more precise and covers also some other testcases.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 337087 ***