After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 330428 - jhbuild of vte should also build vte
jhbuild of vte should also build vte
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: jhbuild
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: module sets
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal blocker
: ---
Assigned To: James Henstridge
Jhbuild QA
Depends on: 330431
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-02-08 16:11 UTC by Stefan Sauer (gstreamer, gtkdoc dev)
Modified: 2006-02-08 17:25 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
enable new dependency (711 bytes, patch)
2006-02-08 16:25 UTC, Stefan Sauer (gstreamer, gtkdoc dev) 		none Details | Review

Description Stefan Sauer (gstreamer, gtkdoc dev) 2006-02-08 16:11:40 UTC 
vte is a dependency for gnome-terminal. vte requires libzvt, which also links against glib-2.0. This causes the build to link against a jhbuild-glib and a system glib, as libzvt is not in the jhbuild modules-set for meta-gnome-core.

(ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/libzvt/2.0)
Comment 1 Stefan Sauer (gstreamer, gtkdoc dev) 2006-02-08 16:25:52 UTC 
Created attachment 58944 [details] [review]
enable new dependency

I tried to enable the new dependency, this as such works. Unfortunately the build of libzvt from cvs fails :(
see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330431
Comment 2 Olav Vitters 2006-02-08 16:35:13 UTC 
Why do you think vte requires libzvt? This is not the case. Libzvt has been obsoleted by vte. Furthermore libzvt is unmaintained.
Comment 3 Stefan Sauer (gstreamer, gtkdoc dev) 2006-02-08 17:20:13 UTC 
have a look into the configure script of vte, if it find zvt it build against it, which breaks jhbuild.
For now I've disabled that part of configure, as there is no switch like --without-zvt.

Should the zvt stuff be removed from vte?
Comment 4 Olav Vitters 2006-02-08 17:25:35 UTC 
Yes, should be removed. Filed as bug 330441.