GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 325995
Eye of Gnome crashes when deleting multiple files
Last modified: 2006-01-06 16:36:59 UTC
Distribution: Ubuntu 5.10 (breezy) Package: EOG Severity: Normal Version: GNOME2.12.1 2.12.1 Gnome-Distributor: Ubuntu Synopsis: Eye of Gnome crashes when deleting multiple files Bugzilla-Product: EOG Bugzilla-Component: general Bugzilla-Version: 2.12.1 BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.12.0) Description: Description of the crash: When I select multiple files in eog, then hit del, it asks "do you really want to move x files to trash?" or words to that effect, and if yes, crashes with this error: ** ERROR **: file eog-window.c: line 2993 (handle_image_selection_changed): assertion failed: (EOG_IS_IMAGE (image)) aborting... The files are deleted, by the way. (Not moved to trash, as far as I can see). Steps to reproduce the crash: 1. Start eog in directory mode 2. Select two or more files 3. Hit del key 4. Click 'yes' 5. Crash Expected Results: Does not crash. How often does this happen? Every time. Additional info: Kernel has ExecShield patch, but if I turn it off temporarily (echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield) this still happens, so I guess that it's not related. Debugging Information: Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/eog' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) `system-supplied DSO at 0x66c000' has disappeared; keeping its symbols. (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208633664 (LWP 8408)] [New Thread 53771184 (LWP 8410)] [New Thread 83102640 (LWP 8409)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x0066c402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 64998
Thread 1 (Thread -1208633664 (LWP 8408))
------- Bug created by bug-buddy at 2006-01-06 16:20 ------- Unknown version 2.12.1 in product EOG. Setting version to "2.12.x".
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 321250 ***