After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 321265 - click on the Window button that has focus, but not in the foreground
click on the Window button that has focus, but not in the foreground
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 90134
Product: libwnck
Classification: Core
Component: tasklist
2.12.x
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: libwnck maintainers
libwnck maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-11-11 21:55 UTC by T. James Leigh
Modified: 2005-12-15 07:06 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.11/2.12



Description T. James Leigh 2005-11-11 21:55:33 UTC
Setup:
* sloppy focus, not raised.
* focused window A is in foreground
* unfocused window B is visible below the focused window.

Action: User moves the mouse from the focused window down to the window list and
clicks on button B.

Expected Result: Window B gets focus and move to foreground.

Actual Result: Window B is minimized.

What happens: As user moves from window A to window B the mouse passes over
window B, giving it focus.  Because window B is focused when clicked it is
minimized.

Solution: Rather than minimizing when window has focus, minimize only when
window has focus and is in foreground.

Other information:
Comment 1 Vincent Untz 2005-12-15 06:55:37 UTC
Moving to libwnck. I'm not sure I agree with you, but I'll let other people
comment :-)
Comment 2 Elijah Newren 2005-12-15 07:06:01 UTC
I totally agree with the reporter.  I'm just lame and haven't ever gotten around
to it, at least partially because "in foreground" doesn't work with the
existence of on top windows and the best modification ("stacked as high as it
can be") is somewhat hard to detect (since they layering algorithm is something
the WM can muck with without exposing and libwnck is supposed to be WM
independent...)

However, it's a duplicate...

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 90134 ***