After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 318303 - "Open link target" context menu option for symlinks
"Open link target" context menu option for symlinks
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.14.x
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: 2.14.x
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
: 604248 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-10-08 21:26 UTC by Alexander “weej” Jones
Modified: 2013-01-15 23:37 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.13/2.14


Attachments
Adds option to open a links target folder (4.51 KB, patch)
2009-10-04 14:08 UTC, Marcus Carlson
reviewed Details | Review

Description Alexander “weej” Jones 2005-10-08 21:26:37 UTC
This option, vs. the traditional "Open" option should open the link target by
first resolving the symlink.
Comment 1 Christian Neumair 2005-10-12 14:13:59 UTC
Thanks for your bug report!
I can see no reason why one would need such a feature. My shell behaves like
Nautilus does ATM, it hides away the actual location the symlink points to.
Maybe you could elaborate on what problem you're trying to solve?
Comment 2 Alexander “weej” Jones 2005-10-17 18:41:12 UTC
Sometimes you might want to use the symlink as if it were more like a shortcut.
If I create a .desktop file to be a shortcut I can't use it in the shell.
Comment 3 Christian Neumair 2005-10-17 18:47:48 UTC
You can use it in the shell like a shortcut?
Comment 4 Alexander “weej” Jones 2005-10-17 20:08:30 UTC
Yeah, cd -P symlink.
Comment 5 Alexander “weej” Jones 2005-10-17 20:39:59 UTC
Updating versions and reopening.
Comment 6 Christian Neumair 2005-10-17 20:44:28 UTC
I have no clue how we can support this in an intuitive fashion.
Comment 7 Alexander “weej” Jones 2005-10-17 21:05:22 UTC
Easy, just add a folder context menu underneath "Open" on folders, as "Open link
target".

This resolves the symlink, and changes directory to that.
Comment 8 csh 2005-10-19 14:57:15 UTC
I think opening a symlink should be treated as a shortcut too.

About 99.9% of the time, that's what I'm using symlinks for when browsing with
Nautilus.  I most definitely do not want the symlink path in there, I want to
jump to the real path.

A bad side effect of current behavior too is that Nautilus passes the symlink
path to applications, so it gets stored in various places.

Think about how often people create several shortcuts to save some time, and
then remove them.  Now we have a bunch of broken paths stored.

It's not as big a deal in the shell, because most of the time file operations
are local, or the applications are written to handle the symlink issue.

Very, very few GUI applications are designed with symlinks in mind.


Comment 9 csh 2005-10-19 15:04:54 UTC
I meant to add: my biggest problem right now is that Nautilus is crashing or
failing to update when viewing via a symlink.  If that were fixed I'd be more
flexible on this issue... :)
Comment 10 Alexander “weej” Jones 2006-06-04 23:51:57 UTC
Updating versions. Still an issue.
Comment 11 Marcus Carlson 2009-10-04 14:08:34 UTC
Created attachment 144711 [details] [review]
Adds option to open a links target folder
Comment 12 Alexander Larsson 2009-10-06 15:15:06 UTC
I don't think adding this makes any sense. Instead we should just finish the work to propely support both symlinks (pretend /home is /home, not /mnt/some-device/hom) and shortcut (desktop files that let you open a target uri quickly) in the UI. This was decided long ago in various discussions, but we never really realized it.
Comment 13 A. Walton 2009-10-07 20:25:47 UTC
Comment on attachment 144711 [details] [review]
Adds option to open a links target folder

Setting patch status per Alex's comment.
Comment 14 Marcus Carlson 2009-10-10 23:03:42 UTC
Close as wontfix then?
Comment 15 Cosimo Cecchi 2011-03-31 19:01:24 UTC
Yes, as for comment #12.
Comment 16 António Fernandes 2013-01-15 23:37:21 UTC
*** Bug 604248 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***