After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 309701 - date ordering within thread should always be descending
date ordering within thread should always be descending
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 652821
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.2.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Low enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-07-07 11:34 UTC by Mikel Ward
Modified: 2012-03-08 10:03 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10


Attachments
mails not in descending as per time (319.95 KB, image/png)
2007-11-26 10:14 UTC, Kandepu Prasad
Details

Description Mikel Ward 2005-07-07 11:34:37 UTC
Please describe the problem:
My standard mail view is:
Group By: Subject (Descending)
Sort: Date (Descending)

Most threads appear like this:
Original message                               0
    Reply 1                                    +10min
    Reply 2                                    +15min
    Reply 3                                    +35min

(Assuming one parent and three direct children)

Some mailing lists appear like this:
[Bug 12475] New: can't submit bug report       7:28 PM
    [Bug 12475] New: can't submit bug report   9:21 PM
    [Bug 12475] New: can't submit bug report   8:23 PM
    [Bug 12475] New: can't submit bug report   8:19 PM

Note how the descendents are sorted in /reverse/ chronological order.

Irrespective of the date ordering of the threads, messages within a thread
should be ordered firstly by hierarchy, secondly in oldest to newest
received/sent time.  Since the parent message will always preceed its decendents
chronologically, this ordering is the most logical and is the usual ordering
implemented in other mail clients.



Steps to reproduce:


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
Comment 1 C Shilpa 2005-07-12 06:42:06 UTC
confirming the bug. happening in 2.2.3
Comment 2 André Klapper 2005-07-15 15:59:53 UTC
related to bug 243463
Comment 3 Not Zed 2005-08-08 09:50:57 UTC
what display ording are you using?
Comment 4 Mikel Ward 2005-08-08 11:20:56 UTC
I think lines three and four of my original description provide this
information.  If not, tell me what else I need to add here.
Comment 5 Milan Crha 2007-10-22 14:03:13 UTC
This is included in Evolution 2.12.
Comment 6 Kandepu Prasad 2007-11-26 10:14:43 UTC
Created attachment 99646 [details]
mails not in descending as per time

As one can see in the attachment the selected mail having time stamp 1:28 PM and the child mails having 12:52 PM, 12:54 PM, 1:06 PM and 1:09 PM
Comment 7 Milan Crha 2007-11-26 13:35:13 UTC
I'm not sure what is the bigger problem, if having most recent mail as first in descending order, or that the sub tree is not in descending order. The second thing can be fixed much easier, I guess.
Comment 8 Kandepu Prasad 2007-11-27 06:33:49 UTC
I guess the original or the first mail of the thread should always be the parent and rest all replies to this original mail should be the descendants in the thread in ascending order of the time stamps.
Comment 9 Milan Crha 2007-11-27 11:54:38 UTC
It's the problem, if you've descending ordering, then you've got latest mail first. So it cames first. And making descending first, second as ascending is a bit strange, I guess. You know, what you want is ascending, but main level as descending. Which is strange. I think ascending can work for, especially with a latest thread feature, where are threads sorted based on the latest message in them.
Are you OK with this?
Comment 10 Milan Crha 2011-08-23 15:37:37 UTC
*** Bug 652821 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 André Klapper 2012-03-07 11:28:26 UTC
> Group By: Subject (Descending)

I have no idea how to set this. Steps are welcome in order to reproduce.
Comment 12 Milan Crha 2012-03-08 09:10:50 UTC
Group by for mailer is disabled since, well, I do not know exact version, maybe since 3.0.x or even earlier.
Comment 13 André Klapper 2012-03-08 09:16:19 UTC
I see. NEEDINFO then and asking the reporter for updated steps...
Comment 14 Milan Bouchet-Valat 2012-03-08 09:28:21 UTC
See my duplicate bug 652821, which is more recent. Maybe we should reverse the duplicate link. ;-)
Comment 15 André Klapper 2012-03-08 10:03:04 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 652821 ***