After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 306001 - evolution crashed while trying to delete an IMAP account
evolution crashed while trying to delete an IMAP account
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 324168
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.2.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-05-31 06:40 UTC by C Shilpa
Modified: 2006-06-17 15:52 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.5/2.6



Description C Shilpa 2005-05-31 06:40:19 UTC
Distribution/Version: NLD

Here is the stack trace:
  • #0 ??
  • #1 ??
  • #2 ??
  • #3 ??
  • #4 msgrcv
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 camel_message_info_free
    at camel-folder-summary.c line 2567
  • #7 vee_message_info_free
    at camel-vee-summary.c line 46
  • #8 camel_message_info_free
    at camel-folder-summary.c line 2584
  • #9 camel_folder_summary_clear
    at camel-folder-summary.c line 1034
  • #10 camel_folder_summary_finalize
    at camel-folder-summary.c line 169
  • #11 camel_object_unref
    at camel-object.c line 920
  • #12 camel_folder_finalize
    at camel-folder.c line 193
  • #13 camel_object_unref
    at camel-object.c line 920
  • #14 store_info_unref
    at mail-component.c line 188
  • #15 mail_component_remove_store
    at mail-component.c line 1064
  • #16 mail_component_remove_store_by_uri
    at mail-component.c line 1092
  • #17 account_delete_clicked
    at em-account-prefs.c line 245
  • #18 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_closure_invoke
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 signal_emit_unlocked_R
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_signal_emit
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_button_clicked
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
  • #25 ??
  • #26 ??
  • #27 __JCR_LIST__
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #28 ??
  • #29 ??
  • #30 ??
  • #31 g_value_peek_pointer
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #32 gtk_button_grab_notify
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #33 ??
  • #34 ??
  • #35 ??
  • #36 __JCR_LIST__
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #37 __JCR_LIST__
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #38 ??
  • #39 ??
  • #40 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #41 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #42 g_type_class_meta_marshal
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #43 g_closure_invoke
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #44 signal_emit_unlocked_R
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #45 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #46 g_signal_emit
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #47 gtk_button_released
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #48 ??
  • #49 ??
  • #50 ??
  • #51 g_value_peek_pointer
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #52 gtk_button_released
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #53 ??
  • #54 sortable_info.5
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #55 ??
  • #56 _gtk_marshal_VOID__ENUM_FLOAT
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #57 ??
  • #58 ??
  • #59 ??
  • #60 g_value_peek_pointer
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0

Comment 1 Khasim Shaheed 2005-06-10 11:57:32 UTC
Not able to reproduce. Hence closing the bug.

Feel free to reopen the bug if you face the same issue again.
Comment 2 André Klapper 2006-06-17 15:51:08 UTC
khasim: just because you're unable to reproduce does not mean that you are allowed to close this. plain wrong.
Comment 3 André Klapper 2006-06-17 15:52:20 UTC
marking correctly as a duplicate of bug 324168 - this bug exists and is valid.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 324168 ***