After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 305305 - quit (ctrl+q) should be different from close (ctrl+w)
quit (ctrl+q) should be different from close (ctrl+w)
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: evince
Classification: Core
Component: general
0.3.x
Other Linux
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: Evince Maintainers
Christian Persch
: 305308 318544 586396 604566 663489 677577 704594 706939 733622 736452 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2005-05-24 10:37 UTC by Pablo Rodríguez
Modified: 2014-09-11 06:07 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Pablo Rodríguez 2005-05-24 10:37:56 UTC
Since I had started using evince, I wondered why it doesn't have a Quit command
menu item implemented. As far as I understand, this will improve usability a
lot, since Close is related to the document and Quit is related to the program
itself.

I don't know whether this is already contained in the HIG 2.0, but I think it is
essential to improve usability in evince.
Comment 1 Marco Pesenti Gritti 2005-05-24 11:09:36 UTC
Currently it would not be possible to implement this because there are multiple
evince processes. We plan to use a common shell for all windows for other
reasons though.

Personally I dont like Quit button but it could be just me... ccing Bryan for UI
input about this.
Comment 2 Vincent Noel 2005-05-24 16:21:13 UTC
*** Bug 305308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Nickolay V. Shmyrev 2005-05-24 21:10:27 UTC
I also don't like this kind of UI. User thinks about every window as a document.
Why should we expose the idea of application? I don't think that it would be
usability improvement.
Comment 4 Bryan W Clark 2005-06-14 15:09:22 UTC
If we had the D-BUS style Server and Interface system running then maybe the
Quit button would make sense.  It would be more like the Mac system and you'd
have no other way to manually quit the server application.  However for now
there's no need for a quit interface.
Comment 5 Christian Persch 2005-10-11 12:12:54 UTC
*** Bug 318544 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Christian Persch 2009-06-19 15:00:15 UTC
*** Bug 586396 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Christian Persch 2009-12-15 12:14:30 UTC
*** Bug 604566 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Christian Persch 2011-11-06 13:02:22 UTC
*** Bug 663489 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Christian Persch 2012-06-06 20:14:51 UTC
*** Bug 677577 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Christian Persch 2013-07-20 08:08:26 UTC
*** Bug 704594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Germán Poo-Caamaño 2013-08-27 23:34:39 UTC
*** Bug 706939 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Germán Poo-Caamaño 2014-07-23 18:23:08 UTC
*** Bug 733622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Germán Poo-Caamaño 2014-09-11 06:07:02 UTC
*** Bug 736452 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***