After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 266084 - Crash: On read next or previous mail with mail preview enabled
Crash: On read next or previous mail with mail preview enabled
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 242867
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
unspecified
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Triage Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-09-16 11:37 UTC by marco.campesi
Modified: 2004-09-20 15:37 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description marco.campesi 2004-09-16 11:37:05 UTC 
Distribution: SuSE Linux 9.1 (i586)
Package: Evolution
Priority: Normal
Version: GNOME2.4.1 unspecified
Gnome-Distributor: GNOME.Org
Synopsis: On read next or previous mail with mail preview enabled
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Mailer
Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.4.0.1)
Description:
Description of the crash:
On read next or previous mail with mail preview enabled

Steps to reproduce the crash:
1. 
2. 
3. 

Expected Results:


How often does this happen?
about 5/100 times

Additional Information:



Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/opt/gnome/bin/evolution-1.4'

(no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using
libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1094685312 (LWP 5565)]
[New Thread 1123691440 (LWP 5981)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1094685312 (LWP 5565)]
[New Thread 1123691440 (LWP 5981)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1094685312 (LWP 5565)]
[New Thread 1123691440 (LWP 5981)]
[New Thread 1121590192 (LWP 5572)]
[New Thread 1119488944 (LWP 5571)]
[New Thread 1116744624 (LWP 5570)]
[New Thread 1114643376 (LWP 5569)]
[New Thread 1112542128 (LWP 5568)]
[New Thread 1108495280 (LWP 5567)]
[New Thread 1106394032 (LWP 5566)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...0xffffe410 in ?? ()

+ Trace 50191

  • #0 ??
  • #1 ??
  • #2 ??
  • #3 ??
  • #4 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
  • #5 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #6 segv_redirect
  • #7 <signal handler called>
  • #8 gtk_widget_get_accessible
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #9 html_utils_get_accessible
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
  • #10 gtk_html_a11y_ref_child
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
  • #11 atk_object_ref_accessible_child
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0
  • #12 spi_atk_bridge_signal_listener
    from /opt/gnome/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge.so
  • #13 signal_emit_unlocked_R
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_signal_emit_by_name
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gail_container_real_remove_gtk
    from /opt/gnome/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.so
  • #17 gail_container_remove_gtk
    from /opt/gnome/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.so
  • #18 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_closure_invoke
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 signal_emit_unlocked_R
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_signal_emit
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_container_remove
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 destroy
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
  • #25 destroy
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
  • #26 html_object_destroy
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
  • #27 destroy
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
  • #28 destroy
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4
  • #29 ??
  • #30 ??
  • #31 g_malloc
    from /opt/gnome/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 



Unknown reporter: marco.campesi@s3s.it, changed to bugbuddy-import@ximian.com.
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.
Comment 1 Gerardo Marin 2004-09-20 15:37:15 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 242867 ***