After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 233460 - Creating of mailing lists
Creating of mailing lists
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Contacts
pre-1.5 (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-addressbook-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-11-07 22:31 UTC by Simen Sandberg
Modified: 2004-02-03 03:01 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Here I'm trying to drag Elisabeth over, but get Langrusten. (90.02 KB, image/png)
2002-11-07 22:33 UTC, Simen Sandberg
Details

Description Simen Sandberg 2002-11-07 22:31:10 UTC
Please fill in this template when reporting a bug, unless you know what you
are doing.
Description of Problem:
I get the wrong address when dragging contacts from a "telephone list" to a
contact list.

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Open the contacts module
2. View -> Active view -> Telephone list
3. New -> Contact list
4. Drag a contact from the list to the add members-window.

Actual Results:
Some other address from the list are added

Expected Results:
The address I drag from the list should be added

How often does this happen? 
Allways from a telephone list, but never from a address card list.

Additional Information:
I'm using the norwegian translation of Evolution, so you might have to
guess what I try to do here... :o)
Comment 1 Simen Sandberg 2002-11-07 22:33:12 UTC
Created attachment 41704 [details]
Here I'm trying to drag Elisabeth over, but get Langrusten.
Comment 2 Chris Toshok 2003-01-08 01:11:15 UTC
hm, this happens when there's a sort, the index is probably off when
we start the drag.
Comment 3 Chris Toshok 2003-01-08 01:16:22 UTC
Actually it seems it's a gal bug in e_table_view_to_model_row..
probably something in e-table-sorter/e-table-sorted.  Maybe it's fixed
in a newer gal?  CC'ing mkestner
Comment 4 Gerardo Marin 2004-02-03 03:01:54 UTC
Can't duplicate this in 1.4.5 or greater.