After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 222558 - Evolution imposes it's view on IMAP folders
Evolution imposes it's view on IMAP folders
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 215240
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
unspecified
Other All
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-03-26 20:24 UTC by support
Modified: 2002-04-29 02:35 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description support 2002-03-26 20:24:30 UTC
Package: Evolution
Priority: Major
Version: 1.0.2
Synopsis: Evolution imposes it's view on IMAP folders
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Mailer

Description:
One of the features of IMAP is it being multi-user.  I can read my
messages from at home and at work.  My co-workers can select
and process messages from a common input mail box.

This breaks now with evolution.  If I don't close down my session
at work evolution gets very confused (at best) when I delete
messages from my home.  Worse it will reset the Unseen flag on
messages already read.  This has caused us problems with our
customer service email by having us process requests multiple
times.

It appears that evolution polls the server for state information, and
then assumes that it is the authority.  This is incorrect, the server
always has the current/correct state. Netscape mail checks
the status in the background every mail poll interval and updates
the display accordingly.  If a message gets deleted it gives a
message instead of hanging arguing with the server about
the message id.

I don't recall seeing this problem in the pre 1.0 versions of
evolution.


Comment 1 Not Zed 2002-04-11 06:03:28 UTC
Well the guys using 0.99 did.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 215240 ***
Comment 2 Jeffrey Stedfast 2002-04-11 18:47:29 UTC
*** bug 215240 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Gerardo Marin 2002-04-11 19:35:12 UTC
Yet another circular duplicate, sorry for the spam: reopening.
Comment 4 Not Zed 2002-04-29 02:35:23 UTC
Now we've got 2 open bugs of the same thing.

I'm marking this one as the duplicate.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 215240 ***