After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 221219 - Crash: bad rules invocation?
Crash: bad rules invocation?
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 221604
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
unspecified
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-03-01 18:22 UTC by matt-spam
Modified: 2002-03-08 22:54 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description matt-spam 2002-03-01 18:22:42 UTC 
Package: Evolution
Priority: Normal
Version: 1.0.2
Synopsis: bad rules invocation?
Bugzilla-Product: Evolution
Bugzilla-Component: Mailer

Description:
Dunno, I think this has to do with trying to move something (sent
message or rule-based move) to a mailbox that doesn't exist anymore....



Debugging Information:

(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 1024 (LWP 18577)]
[New Thread 2049 (LWP 18647)]
[New Thread 1026 (LWP 18648)]
[New Thread 4099 (LWP 18653)]
[New Thread 3076 (LWP 18650)]
[New Thread 6149 (LWP 18758)]
[New Thread 7174 (LWP 18759)]
0x41090e29 in __wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6

+ Trace 18512

Thread 3 (Thread 1026 (LWP 18648))

  • #0 __sigsuspend
    at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sigsuspend.c line 45
  • #1 __pthread_wait_for_restart_signal
    at pthread.c line 969
  • #2 __pthread_alt_lock
    at restart.h line 34
  • #3 __pthread_mutex_lock
    at mutex.c line 120
  • #4 message_browser_get_type
  • #5 pthread_sighandler
    at signals.c line 97
  • #6 <signal handler called>
  • #7 timeout_cb
    at camel-remote-store.c line 219
  • #8 mail_receive_uri
  • #9 mail_msg_wait_all
  • #10 thread_received_msg
    at e-msgport.c line 469
  • #11 thread_dispatch
    at e-msgport.c line 550
  • #12 pthread_start_thread
    at manager.c line 284
Comment 1 Gerardo Marin 2002-03-08 22:54:59 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 221604 ***