After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 160610 - Crash while trying to save in GEdit
Crash while trying to save in GEdit
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Product: gedit
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.6.x
Other other
: High critical
: 2.10.0
Assigned To: Gedit maintainers
gedit QA volunteers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-12-06 19:58 UTC by Nathan Summers
Modified: 2005-02-28 17:09 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Nathan Summers 2004-12-06 19:58:36 UTC
Distribution: Debian 3.1
Package: gedit
Severity: normal
Version:  2.6.2
Synopsis: Crash while trying to save in GEdit
Bugzilla-Product: gedit
Bugzilla-Component: general
Bugzilla-Version: 2.6.2
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.8.0)
Description:
I tried to save a file in GEdit.  It crashed instead.  Stack trace
should be included if bug-buddy does its thing.


Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gedit'

(no debugging symbols found)...Using host libthread_db library
"/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[Thread debugging using
libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1085193216 (LWP 3435)]
[New Thread 1109674928 (LWP 19814)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1085193216 (LWP 3435)]
[New Thread 1109674928 (LWP 19814)]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1085193216 (LWP 3435)]
[New Thread 1109674928 (LWP 19814)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging
symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...(no debugging symbols found)...0x4118a431 in __waitpid_nocancel
() from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
  • #0 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 ??
  • #3 ??
  • #4 ??
  • #5 g_thread_use_default_impl
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 g_thread_use_default_impl
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
  • #16 g_mem_chunk_alloc
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #17 <signal handler called>
  • #18 _gnome_vfs_client_call_finished
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #19 ??
  • #20 ??
  • #21 ??
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #23 ??
  • #24 ??
  • #25 ??
  • #26 gnome_vfs_result_from_errno
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #27 ??
  • #28 ??
  • #29 ??
  • #30 pthread_mutex_init
    from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
  • #31 ??
  • #32 ??
  • #33 ??
  • #34 ??
  • #35 ??
  • #36 ??
  • #37 ??
  • #38 ??
  • #39 ??
  • #40 ??
  • #41 ??
  • #42 g_slist_prepend
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2004-12-06 14:58 -------


Unknown version 2.6.2 in product gedit.  Setting version to "2.6.x".
Unknown platform unknown. Setting to default platform "Other".
Unknown milestone "unknown" in product "gedit".
   Setting to default milestone for this product, '---'
Setting to default status "UNCONFIRMED".
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Paolo Borelli 2004-12-06 21:31:06 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 151715 ***
Comment 2 Paolo Maggi 2004-12-07 09:03:48 UTC
pbor: are you sure this is a duplicate of bug 151715. It seems to have a
different stack trace.

Nathan: thanks for the bug report. Unfortunately, that stack trace is not very
useful in determining the cause of the crash. Please make sure that the package
was compiled with debugging symbols and see
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/getting-traces.cgi for more information about useful
stack traces.

Which version of gtk+, libgnome, libgnomeui and gedit are you using?
If you are using libgnomeui 2.6.x (x < 2), please, try to see if there is an
available update for 2.6.y (y >= 2).
Comment 3 Paolo Borelli 2004-12-07 09:12:40 UTC
oops sorry I should have looked more closely, but we get so much dups of that bug...

However note that it's still probably a dup since Debian with gedit-2.6 is one
of the typical configurations affected by 151715, the crash happened while
trying to save and gnomevfs seems to be involved looking at the little that
could be read from the current stack trace.
Comment 4 Nathan Summers 2004-12-09 20:42:31 UTC
Sorry the stack trace came out as crap.  Debian seems to strip their binaries,
which is good for disk space, but makes bug-buddy somewhat less useful.  I would
be happy to recompile from source, but as I can't reproduce the bug, I'm not
sure how helpful that would be.  Here are the package versions you requested:

ii  libgtk2.0-0    2.4.13-1       The GTK+ graphical user interface library
ii  libgnome2-0    2.8.0-5        The GNOME 2 library - runtime files
ii  libgnomeui-0   2.8.0-3        The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interface) - run
ii  gedit          2.6.2-1        light-weight text editor

This is what I had done when the crash occured:  Gedit was loaded by the session
manager with the last file I had edited.  I had some text I wanted to save from
gnome-terminal, so I selected it, created a new tab in gedit, and pasted it with
the middle mouse button.  I then hit the save button, and the program crashed.
Comment 5 Paolo Maggi 2004-12-10 09:04:12 UTC
This is not a duplicate of bug #151715 since the version of libgnomeui is not
2.6.x (AFAIK, 2.8.0 does not have such problem).

Unfortunately, the attached stack trace is not very useful in determining the
cause of the crash.

I will try to reproduce it following the steps you reported in your last comment.
Comment 6 Paolo Maggi 2005-02-27 21:34:17 UTC
I have tried to reproduce this bug following the steps described by the
reported, but gedit didn't crash.

Since it is not possible to determine the cause of the crash from the attached
stack trace, I'm closing this bug as INCOMPLETE.

Nathan: please, reopen it if you are still able to reproduce it and/or you have
more info or a better stack trace.
Comment 7 Nathan Summers 2005-02-28 17:09:28 UTC
I still can't reproduce the crash.  I have no clue what happened.