After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 153351 - [PATCH] Allow notification of apps to move displays
[PATCH] Allow notification of apps to move displays
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: Widget: Other
2.4.x
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: Medium feature
Assigned To: gtk-bugs
gtk-bugs
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-09-22 02:46 UTC by Perry Lorier
Modified: 2013-10-06 06:43 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Patch to trigger changing of displays (1.64 KB, patch)
2004-09-22 02:47 UTC, Perry Lorier
needs-work Details | Review

Description Perry Lorier 2004-09-22 02:46:13 UTC
This patch makes any gtk window respond to the _GTK_CHANGE_DISPLAY property as a
notification to move to a new display.  This can be used by applets or window
managers to cause a window to move to a different display. This can be used for
instance in hotdesking, or in conjunction with software like Synergy to deal
with multiple computers.

Other uses would be for applications to be "parked" on a vnc server when a user
logs out, and then later "reattached" when the user logs in again to provide
screen(1)-like functionality.
Comment 1 Perry Lorier 2004-09-22 02:47:57 UTC
Created attachment 31805 [details] [review]
Patch to trigger changing of displays

Attach patch
Comment 2 Matthias Clasen 2004-11-10 03:56:46 UTC
I think this need to be discussed on xdg-list to come up with a protocol which
can be used by all major toolkits. In that case, it should obviously not be
named _GTK, but probably _NET. I wonder if it would be nicer to use a
ClientMessage to initiate the move.
Comment 3 Perry Lorier 2004-11-10 04:20:55 UTC
Thank you for your comments. I think I've found the xdg-list you're talking
about[1], I'll write up an email and propose it there with your comments.  I've
never done any X11 or g[td]k hacking before this, so this should be an uh,
learning experience.


[1]: xdg at fd.o?
Comment 4 Matthias Clasen 2004-12-22 04:52:07 UTC
I have a patch for a modified protocol, need to get back to it. It does not make
too much sense without fixing gdk_display_close(), though.
Comment 5 Federico Mena Quintero 2009-03-05 19:09:52 UTC
We have a bug aboug making gdk_display_close() work, BTW.
Comment 6 Matthias Clasen 2013-10-06 06:43:48 UTC
not going to happen, I don't think