GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 148796
gnome terminal horrible performance
Last modified: 2004-12-22 21:47:04 UTC
Why does gnome-terminal takes so many resources to perform trivial tasks such as scrolling text up? Experiment: Run gnome-terminal and xterm side by side. Do a "cat filename" on a very large file in each one of them and see which one is faster. xterm can be faster by orders of magnitude (i'm not making things up). Compile an application that makes gcc very verbose in each terminal. With gnome-terminal, the overall system load is significantly higher. Run a "tail -f" on a log file, while at the same time running a time- and load-sensitive application such as any digital sound recorder (Ardour with JACK) or sequencer (Rosegarden, Muse). If "tail -f" runs in gnome-terminal, and the time-critical app does not run with real-time privileges, parts of the sound stream will get dropped. The drops occur at a much lower frequency (if at all) when running "tail -f" in xterm. I mean, gnome-terminal is nice and all, but why is it such a huge resource hog? I am not the first one to raise a flag on this issue. gnome-terminal essentially makes it difficult to do time-critical work on a Gnome workstation. I actually avoid using it.
This is a duplicate of bug #122871 Yes, gnome-terminal is crap in performance. No, actually, its even worse than that :)
I have to confess that comments like that do certainly not motivate me. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 122871 ***