After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 140876 - creating a document does not set the file's access rights properly
creating a document does not set the file's access rights properly
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 147893
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: File and Folder Operations
2.9.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
: 136966 142021 167005 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2004-04-22 20:28 UTC by Antoine Pitrou
Modified: 2005-02-12 22:44 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.9/2.10



Description Antoine Pitrou 2004-04-22 20:28:17 UTC
When I "create a document" from the context menu
in Nautilus, Nautilus creates the file with:

- the wrong chmod: it does not enforce my user's
umask and instead uses what seems to be a default
value (chmod 600)
- the wrong group ownership : if I create a file
in a directory that has the gid sticky bit set
(with "chmod g+s"), the file does not inherit the
directory's group as it should. Instead it gets
associated to the user's default group.

Please take note that the "create directory"
function does not have this bug: it enforces both
my umask settings and the gid sticky bit.
Comment 1 Martin Wehner 2004-05-16 23:58:26 UTC
*** Bug 136966 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Martin Wehner 2004-05-16 23:59:46 UTC
From #136966:

If I use nautilus to create a new, blank file by using the File->Create
Document->Empty File feature, the new file has group wheel (0) instead of
the user's default group.
Comment 3 Antoine Pitrou 2004-06-06 18:43:53 UTC
Still there (2.6.1).
Comment 4 Christian Neumair 2004-07-23 11:58:46 UTC
*** Bug 142021 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Jean-Baptiste Biard 2005-02-11 21:14:03 UTC
*** Bug 167005 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Jean-Baptiste Biard 2005-02-11 21:17:21 UTC
Still there in 2.8.2
Comment 7 Sebastien Bacher 2005-02-12 22:44:51 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 147893 ***