After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 127581 - The the initial position of the rtl-oriented GtkTreeView is wrong
The the initial position of the rtl-oriented GtkTreeView is wrong
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: Widget: GtkTreeView
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gtktreeview-bugs
gtktreeview-bugs
Depends on:
Blocks: 76219 127874
 
 
Reported: 2003-11-21 03:58 UTC by chinen
Modified: 2011-02-04 16:16 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Proposed patch (Based on CVS 2003/Nov/19) (3.55 KB, patch)
2003-11-28 04:28 UTC, chinen
none Details | Review

Description chinen 2003-11-21 03:58:26 UTC
The initial position of rtl-oriented GtkTreeView should be right side.
However, the initial position is left side.

[Steps to Reproduce]
1.Run test/gtktreeview in the bidi locale (e.g. he_IL).
2.Resize top shell of this application till horizontal scroll bar appears.
  At this time, Column 0 is hidden. <-- Problem!
3.Perform some scrolling, then increase and decrease the width of the shell.
  Every time, Column 0 is hidden. <-- Problem!

[Actual Results]
Left side of the GtkTreeView appears in the narrowed scrolled window. 
Increasing and decreasing of scrolled window increase and decrease
visible part of the GtkTreeView from the right.

[Expected Results]
Right side of the GtkTreeView should appear in the narrowed scrolled window.
Increasing and decreasing of scrolled window should increase and decrease 
visible part of the GtkTreeView from the left.
Comment 1 chinen 2003-11-21 04:00:34 UTC
We created a patch for this problem.
Could you please check this patch?
This patch is for the source in CVS on 2003/Nov/19.

  http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/linux/patches/?patch_id=1189

Thank you,
Comment 2 chinen 2003-11-28 04:28:07 UTC
Created attachment 21876 [details] [review]
Proposed patch (Based on CVS 2003/Nov/19)
Comment 3 chinen 2003-11-28 04:29:36 UTC
The attached patch is the same as the patch at the above-mentioned URL.
Thanks.
Comment 4 Matthias Clasen 2003-12-06 00:39:27 UTC
No API involved, AFAICS.