After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 125981 - copy file crash with samba
copy file crash with samba
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 107741
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: Navigation
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-11-01 13:55 UTC by alad1
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description alad1 2003-11-01 13:56:01 UTC 
Package: nautilus
Severity: normal
Version: 2.2.1
Synopsis: copy file crash with samba
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: Navigation
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.2.0.1)

Description:
Description of Problem:
crash natautilus with samba

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. open samba conection in share windows2003 (graphical environement)
2. open directory local with natililus
3. copy file local to share distant 

Actual Results:
the crash apear after two or many file copied to the share

Expected Results:


How often does this happen?


Additional Information:




Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 16384 (LWP 2265)]
[New Thread 32769 (LWP 2273)]
[New Thread 16386 (LWP 2274)]
[New Thread 32771 (LWP 2275)]
[New Thread 49156 (LWP 2276)]
[New Thread 65541 (LWP 2277)]
[New Thread 81926 (LWP 2278)]
0x40ad9f8b in waitpid ()
   from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 41363

Thread 5 (Thread 49156 (LWP 2276))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 valid
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 __pthread_sighandler
    from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 _init
    from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so
  • #5 _init
    from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so
  • #6 get_file_type
    from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so
  • #7 get_file_type
    from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so
  • #8 get_file_type
    from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libsmb.so
  • #9 gnome_vfs_get_file_info_uri_cancellable
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #10 gnome_vfs_get_file_info_uri
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #11 gnome_vfs_uri_exists
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #12 _gnome_vfs_uri_is_in_subdir
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #13 _gnome_vfs_uri_is_in_subdir
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #14 _gnome_vfs_xfer_private
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #15 _gnome_vfs_job_go
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #16 _gnome_vfs_job_execute
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #17 _gnome_vfs_job_queue_shutdown
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #18 _gnome_vfs_thread_pool_init
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #19 g_static_private_free
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #20 pthread_start_thread
    from /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0 




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2003-11-01 08:56 -------

The original reporter (alad1@ifrance.com) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, nautilus-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Comment 1 Martin Wehner 2003-11-06 20:36:23 UTC 
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been
reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report
any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 107741 ***