After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 123019 - gtkcolorsel needs more names/descriptions
gtkcolorsel needs more names/descriptions
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 118339
Product: atk
Classification: Platform
Component: gail
1.3.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: padraig.obriain
padraig.obriain
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-09-23 10:45 UTC by bill.haneman
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description bill.haneman 2003-09-23 10:45:01 UTC
The gtkcolorsel widget is spotty with regard to accessibility; the only
useful info at the moment is from the LABEL_FOR/LABELLED_BY relations
betwen the text-entry fields and the corresponding labels.  I think
accessible-names attached to these basic entry fields (and the Opacity
slider, etc.) could help a lot in helping a user make sense of what exactly
is being changed by the entry-field labelled "Blue", etc.  Also the
foreground/background color swatches have no names, which is a problem. 
It's probably OK that few of the PANELs and FILLERs have names (though a
few names for grouping purposes might be nice).
Comment 1 padraig.obriain 2003-09-24 09:29:43 UTC
What is the test case for this? Is it the color selection dialog in
testgtk?
Comment 2 bill.haneman 2003-09-24 09:41:39 UTC
gtk-demo's color selector is the test case; i.e. .

choose 'Color Selector' from gtk-demo, and 'Change above color'.
But the one in testgtk seems to display the same issues, I believe
it's the same widget.  It'd be worth testing both just to make sure
since there are some minor differences in the initial settings of the
colorsel widget, for instance testgtk shows the 'show opacity' button
and gtk-demo doesn't.
Comment 3 padraig.obriain 2003-09-24 12:53:06 UTC
I am not clear on the benefit of adding accessible names. The slider,
text fields and spin buttons all have accessible descriptions
(tooltips) and are labelled by a label whose accessible name.

Are you suggesting that an object with no accessible name but is
labelled by a label should have the label's accessible name returned
as its accessible name? 
Comment 4 padraig.obriain 2004-03-22 17:49:44 UTC
I am closing this as a duplicate of bug #118339 as I do not think we
need two bugs for accessibility of GtkColorSelection widget.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 118339 ***