After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 105653 - "open" the same as "Open in X new windows" with multiple files
"open" the same as "Open in X new windows" with multiple files
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.13.x
Other All
: Normal normal
: 2.14.x
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
: 40582 317733 319961 321137 481823 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-02-09 16:53 UTC by Mark Finlay
Modified: 2013-04-24 21:01 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.13/2.14


Attachments
Proposed (prelimitary) libnautilus-private/ patch (4.94 KB, patch)
2005-08-28 13:23 UTC, Christian Neumair
none Details | Review
Proposed (prelimitary) src/ patch (18.04 KB, patch)
2005-08-28 13:34 UTC, Christian Neumair
none Details | Review

Description Mark Finlay 2003-02-09 16:53:09 UTC
When I select multiple files of same mime type and right click

1. I should be able to use the "Open With" item in the context menu,
ATM it is greyed out

2. Selecting "Open" should open both files with the open application
if it can accept multiple uris. ATM the Open item is the same as
"Open in 2 new windows"
Comment 1 Mark Finlay 2003-02-09 16:57:17 UTC
Part one is a dupe of bug 48055 but I cannot see a dupe for part 
2 so i'm going to leave this open and change the title.

I'd really love to be able to select 10 jpegs and open them
all in One gimp session instead of 10 gimp sessions.
Comment 2 Kjartan Maraas 2005-01-06 14:35:04 UTC
Still seeing this with 2.8.x
Comment 3 Christian Neumair 2005-08-28 13:18:30 UTC
This is extremely annoying. Fixing it requires too many architectural changes to
be ready for Nautilus 2.12.
Comment 4 Christian Neumair 2005-08-28 13:23:33 UTC
Created attachment 51459 [details] [review]
Proposed (prelimitary) libnautilus-private/ patch

This patch allows to cancellate nautilus file list call_when_ready jobs. It may
be buggy and isn't tested very well. I wonder whether there are multiple
pending requests allowed with identical callback and callback data. If this is
the case, we'd have to give the elements in the stack-like global data GList
IDs.
Comment 5 Christian Neumair 2005-08-28 13:34:42 UTC
Created attachment 51461 [details] [review]
Proposed (prelimitary) src/ patch

Applying this patch has no user-visible effect. It changes the FMDirectoryView
to request activation of multiple files at once, though. Some of the loops in
The code in the activate_callback callback can later be replaced by (to be
created) functions that take multiple files.
Comment 6 Christian Neumair 2005-09-07 17:50:51 UTC
*** Bug 40582 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Christian Neumair 2005-10-02 12:38:19 UTC
*** Bug 317733 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Christian Neumair 2005-11-10 17:18:44 UTC
*** Bug 321137 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Christian Neumair 2005-11-11 08:10:51 UTC
*** Bug 319961 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Matthew East 2005-12-27 01:39:21 UTC
Is this bug likely to be fixed for 2.14? It is quite a serious one, particularly since the emphasis nowadays seems to be on opening applications from the file manager, rather than the menu. The bug is particularly prominent when opening multiple video/music files in TOTEM.
Comment 11 Matthew East 2005-12-27 01:41:04 UTC
sorry for spam, updating version numbers as this is still present in nautilus/GNOME 2.13
Comment 12 Christian Neumair 2005-12-27 11:03:54 UTC
Yes, it is extemely likely that it will be fixed as soon as Alex returns from holidays, and I revised a patch according to Alex's suggestions:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-list/2005-December/msg00019.html
Comment 13 Christian Neumair 2006-01-11 19:34:38 UTC
A patch was committed. Closing.
Comment 14 Matthew East 2006-01-11 20:13:47 UTC
That is awesome news, congrats!
Comment 15 Elijah Newren 2006-06-05 17:13:01 UTC
It appears there was a regression or a bug in the patch -- see bug 343930.
Comment 16 António Fernandes 2013-04-24 21:01:40 UTC
*** Bug 481823 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***