After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 102459 - Theme manager crashed upon opening
Theme manager crashed upon opening
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 101567
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] theme-manager
unspecified
Other other
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Control-Center Maintainers
Control-Center Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2003-01-04 00:52 UTC by David Kennedy
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description David Kennedy 2003-01-04 00:51:50 UTC 
Package: control-center
Severity: critical
Version: GNOME2.1.5 2.1.5
Synopsis: Theme manager crashed upon opening
Bugzilla-Product: control-center
Bugzilla-Component: theme-manager
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (2.1.5)
Description:
Description of Problem:
Clicked on "Theme" under "Desktop Pref.", The window started displaying
and then crashed.



Debugging Information:

Backtrace was generated from
'/home/garnome195/garnome/bin/gnome-theme-manager'

[New Thread 16384 (LWP 2414)]
0x0ed2ec7c in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6

+ Trace 32267

Thread 1 (Thread 16384 (LWP 2414))

  • #0 wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    at gnome-ui-init.c line 646
  • #4 __pthread_sighandler
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 kill
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #7 pthread_kill
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #8 raise
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #9 g_logv
    at gmessages.c line 477 




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2003-01-03 19:51 -------

Reassigning to the default owner of the component, control-center-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Comment 1 Andrew Sobala 2003-01-04 01:15:23 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 101567 ***