After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 101865 - Non-standard shortcuts
Non-standard shortcuts
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-calculator
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Rich Burridge
Rich Burridge
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-12-23 16:59 UTC by Calum Benson
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Calum Benson 2002-12-23 16:59:20 UTC
Currently gcalctool are some non-standard shortcuts (Ctrl-C to close the
app), and some that are only available on Sun keyboards (Props, Copy,
Help).  There may be others that I don't know about :)

Shortcuts should be HIG-compliant, e.g. Ctrl-Q should Quit the app, Ctrl-C
should copy the selected text (or in this case, probably just the whole
display if nothing is selected), Alt-Enter should open the Properties
dialog, F1 should open the Help window.  Ideally these commands should all
appear on a menubar too, although gcalctool currently doesn't have one.

There's a list of standard shortcuts here:
http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/draft_hig/userinput.html#standard-shortcuts
Comment 1 Rich Burridge 2002-12-24 18:47:55 UTC
Thanks for the pointer to the list of standard shortcuts.
Will rework the keyword shortcuts in the New Year.
Comment 2 Rich Burridge 2003-01-22 23:13:35 UTC
This should be fixed now in v4.2.34 of gcalctool.
The menubar sports standard menu items, with standard
keyboard accelerators that now work.

Each of the gcalctool buttons is keyboard navigable,
and also has a keyboard equivalent. These keyboard
equivalents are described in the tooltip help for each
button, and also in the gcalctool manual pages.

Calum, please let me know if you'd like me to adjust
any of these. They hopefully make sense, although in
some cases that's a little strained (as I attempt to
provide uniqueness).