After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 788016 - Add snap packaging
Add snap packaging
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-clocks
Classification: Applications
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Clocks maintainer(s)
Clocks maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2017-09-21 19:49 UTC by Ken VanDine
Modified: 2017-10-07 04:05 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Add snap packaging (3.23 KB, patch)
2017-09-21 19:49 UTC, Ken VanDine
none Details | Review

Description Ken VanDine 2017-09-21 19:49:37 UTC
Created attachment 360219 [details] [review]
Add snap packaging

I'm maintaining this package in the snap store and would like to merge the packaging upstream.  We'd like to get automated builds of the snap for testing/release in the snap store.  I'm happy to maintain the packaging going forward as well.
Comment 1 Paolo Borelli 2017-09-21 20:01:14 UTC
I am fine with having this upstream.

Can we put it in data/ alongside the flatpak dir?
Comment 2 Ken VanDine 2017-10-06 16:20:04 UTC
(In reply to Paolo Borelli from comment #1)
> I am fine with having this upstream.
> 
> Can we put it in data/ alongside the flatpak dir?

The snapcraft tool looks for snapcraft.yaml either in the current dir or in snap/  

If you are ok with it, I can commit this to master.
Comment 3 Paolo Borelli 2017-10-06 20:51:27 UTC
Ok.

For what is worth I really dislike a design decision that forces us to clutter the toplevel dir. If you have any influence over snap please relay this.
Comment 4 Ken VanDine 2017-10-07 04:05:42 UTC
(In reply to Paolo Borelli from comment #3)
> Ok.
> 
> For what is worth I really dislike a design decision that forces us to
> clutter the toplevel dir. If you have any influence over snap please relay
> this.

Thanks, I've pushed this.  I'll talk to the snapcraft developers about adding support to find the packaging in some other more friendly locations.  I think it's reasonable to look in data/snap to keep it inline with others.