After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 699919 - vdpau: Add VdpVideoSurface caps feature
vdpau: Add VdpVideoSurface caps feature
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: GStreamer
Classification: Platform
Component: gst-plugins-bad
git master
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: 1.1.1
Assigned To: GStreamer Maintainers
GStreamer Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2013-05-08 09:50 UTC by sreerenj
Modified: 2013-05-10 08:51 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
vdpau: Add VdpVideoSurface caps feature (1.70 KB, patch)
2013-05-08 09:50 UTC, sreerenj
committed Details | Review

Description sreerenj 2013-05-08 09:50:35 UTC
Created attachment 243570 [details] [review]
vdpau: Add VdpVideoSurface caps feature

vdpau: Add VdpVideoSurface caps feature
Comment 1 Sebastian Dröge (slomo) 2013-05-08 13:00:24 UTC
commit 37352509ebf6975978ceebc08a1ea70f700b1b67
Author: Sreerenj Balachandran <sreerenj.balachandran@intel.com>
Date:   Wed May 8 12:45:20 2013 +0300

    vdpau: Add VdpVideoSurface caps feature
Comment 2 Sebastian Dröge (slomo) 2013-05-08 13:02:03 UTC
Unrelated, in playbin we currently take the sum of decoder and sink rank. Shouldn't we take the product instead?
Comment 3 sreerenj 2013-05-09 08:56:48 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Unrelated, in playbin we currently take the sum of decoder and sink rank.
> Shouldn't we take the product instead?

Why?
Comment 4 Sebastian Dröge (slomo) 2013-05-09 11:13:41 UTC
What's better: dec rank 2, sink rank 2 or dec rank 1, sink rank 3? Both would be rated the same now, with multiplication the first would win.
Comment 5 sreerenj 2013-05-09 12:27:51 UTC
Aha, good point.! You are right, otherwise we need to assume some priority for either decoder or sink. I don't know which one is better. 
What you said might be good (until some one raises complaints) :)
Comment 6 sreerenj 2013-05-10 07:35:47 UTC
Actually the possible values of ranks are 64, 128 and 256.
So the case you mentioned won't happen with these ranks , right ?
Comment 7 Sebastian Dröge (slomo) 2013-05-10 08:43:39 UTC
These are only the ranks that have a name, things like PRIMARY-1 or similar are used.
Comment 8 sreerenj 2013-05-10 08:51:48 UTC
Aha, okay. :)